[atomic-wg] Issue #385: Installer doesn't match Fedora Website

[Andreas Nilsson]

andreasn reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following:
``
The website says "Fedora Atomic", but the uses branding that says "Fedora
Cloud"
<!!image>

``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385

[Dusty Mabe]

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Thanks for the report we'll try to get the media updated in a future 2 week release. 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385

[Dusty Mabe]

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
request for logos package to include atomic logos in it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-logos/issue/3
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385

[Dusty Mabe]

The issue: `Installer doesn't match Fedora Website` of project: `atomic-wg` has been
assigned to `dustymabe` by dustymabe.

https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385

[Dusty Mabe]

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
upstream fedora-logos issue is fixed:
https://pagure.io/fedora-logos/issue/3#comment-486747

should be able to update the productimg rpm soon. 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385

[Steve Milner]

smilner added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Is it not pulled from ``fedora-logos``
[rpm](https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=fedora-logos)? Or is that a
deprecated package that happens to have it's content pulled into the
``product-image-$NAME`` packages?
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385

[Dusty Mabe]

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
>  Is it not pulled from fedora-logos rpm? Or is that a deprecated
> package that happens to have it's content pulled into the product-image-$NAME
> packages?
>  
It is pulled from the fedora-logos rpm, but then that rpm is used as a Buildrequires for
the productimg rpm (believe me, i was confused at first too). so we have to get the new
fedora-logos rpm and then we can update the productimg rpm to use the new atomic logos. 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385

[Steve Milner]

smilner added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
@spot mind adding a build for the ``fedora-logos`` package? I started to do so but
don't have access to that package:

```
Update requested to fix branding for Fedora Atomic Host.

Updates:

- Move CSS for logos in the graphical installer into fedora-logos
- create atomic files for anaconda to use (https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385)
```
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385

[Dusty Mabe]

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7213#comment-489888

the fix for this should be in the next builds of f27 atomic host. 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385

[Dusty Mabe]

dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
Officially in Fedora 27 now:
https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/187354#step/_boot_to_anaconda/3. Will be in the
next release. 
``

To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385

[Dusty Mabe]

The status of the issue: `Installer doesn't match Fedora Website` of project:
`atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe.

https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/385