dustymabe reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` We would like to have a VFAD (virtual Fedora Activity Day) on March 9th at approximately [Fri Mar 9 15:00:00 UTC 2018](https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?qm=1&lid=100,5,4839366&h=100&dat...)
Proposed topics for the VFAD include:
- [rpm-ostree rojig](https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1081) (special way of delivering ostree updates) - others? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
smilner added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
rpm-ostree rojig (special way of delivering ostree updates)
I feel like we've almost over talked about rpm-ostree jigdo/rojig as a group but, if @walters is good with it I'd be OK with it as a topic ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
walters added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
I feel like we've almost over talked about rpm-ostree jigdo/rojig as a group
I agree, not sure it needs to be a VFAD topic. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
I feel like we've almost over talked about rpm-ostree jigdo/rojig as a group
I agree, not sure it needs to be a VFAD topic.
I thought the reason we wanted to bring it up was because there were questions related to the intersection of that and modularity. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
sanja added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
I feel like we've almost over talked about rpm-ostree jigdo/rojig as a group I agree, not sure it needs to be a VFAD topic.
I thought the reason we wanted to bring it up was because there were questions related to the intersection of that and modularity.
I'd also like to hear about it so wouldn't mind that topic - ELI5 style, please. Might also uncover possible issues. Explaining the basics instead of getting caught up in details usually does. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
smilner added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
I thought the reason we wanted to bring it up was because there were questions related to the intersection of that and modularity.
Ok, if it is something we haven't discussed yet then I'd :thumbsup:. Do you mind posting or linking to the question(s). I may be a bit out of this specific loop. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
walters added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
I thought the reason we wanted to bring it up was because there were questions related to the intersection of that and modularity.
Ah...I'm not certain; like whether rpm-ostree would learn about modules? Or the other way around of building AH from a module (that's dead with new "addon modularity" right?)
I think we need to brainstorm a bit on other topics too and then choose among them.
What about `oc cluster up` usability/packaging? Personally it drives me nuts that it uses a hardcoded password by default. Should we add it to FAW by default? I notice it's now "just" 40MB.
Or hacking on the docs and our general docs story.
Or a `podman` focus?
Or maybe CI?
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
smilner added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
What about oc cluster up usability/packaging? Personally it drives me nuts that it uses a hardcoded password by default. Should we add it to FAW by default? I notice it's now "just" 40MB.
Not a bad idea. Worth discussing IMHO as it provides a way for developers to easily develop against Openshift on FAW. Same question for minishift.
Or hacking on the docs and our general docs story.
@sanja has done a lot of work in that area. What do you think @sanja?
Or a podman focus?
Brent has ping'd on issues related to podman so it may be a good time.
- [Evaluate podman for inclusion in atomic host](https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/422) - [AH with Podman for CI tests only](https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/432)
Or maybe CI?
Something CI would be good. Problem here is it is a really broad topic :smile:. If we can pin it down to a few pain points or wanted changes then it could be a good discussion topic. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` discussed in the meeting today here is the list of topics (I will update the description):
[upstream technology]
- (walters) rpm-ostree rojig - short presentation/demo (from walters) [5 minutes] - (walters) rpm-ostree rojig - Q&A [ max 10 minutes ] - (micah) podman - pros/cons to including it in the host vs using as a container (micah) [ 10 minutes ]
[community direction]
- (sanja) closing the communication channels ticket anyway and explaining on video why [ 10 minutes ] - (sanja) discussion on whether Project Atomic needs to step away from the "umbrella" and make it clear what it's about, spin off projects [ 30 minutes ]
[Atomic workstation]
- (sanja) suggestion for rebranding atomic workstation [ 20 minutes ] - (walters) dev/pet container tools - gather links to examples/docs [ 10 minutes ] - (walters) Minimizing content set in FAW [ 10 minutes ] - https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/pull-request/74
[Q&A for users]
- (walters) Q&A session for atomic host/workstation users [ 20 minutes ] ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
ttomecek added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Any plans talking about container images? (delivery, automation, future plans, OSBS status and plans, testing) Sorry I did not attend the meeting. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
Any plans talking about container images? (delivery, automation, future plans, OSBS status and plans, testing) Sorry I did not attend the meeting.
Not for this VFAD since we already have a loaded agenda. Next one? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
jlebon added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Can we add this to the Atomic calendar? https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/atomic/ Hopefully this isn't a selfish request and there's other people who have it linked to their calendar app of choice! :) ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` The vFAD is complete. Thanks to everyone who came
- etherpad [link](https://public.etherpad-mozilla.org/p/2018-03-09_Fedora-Atomic-WG-vFAD) - recording[link](https://dustymabe.fedorapeople.org/2018-03-09_Fedora-Atomic-WG-vFAD.mp4) - etherpad pdf ( below)
[](/atomic-wg/issue/raw/files/3ea40a38b8d9f00594d8f26da5840729d13966cb723f56cf8f479bf1095e40f7-2018-03-09_Fedora-Atomic-WG-vFAD.pdf) ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429
The status of the issue: `20180309: Topics for march VFAD` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe.
atomic@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Colin Walters -
Dusty Mabe
-
Jonathan Lebon
-
Sanja Bonic
-
Steve Milner
-
Tomas Tomecek