pwalter reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` There's an up to date F27 atomic workstation repo at https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/ostree/27 , but it seems to be only for F27 and doesn't have any rawhide content.
dustymabe pointed me to the older https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/ostree/rawhide/ repo, which however hasn't been updated for a month now. According to https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/ostree/rawhide/refs/heads/fedora/... the last timestamp is 2017-12-18 09:27
dustymabe said on irc that rawhide composes must have been failing and asked me to file this ticket. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/409
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` looks like at least [one failure](https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180116.n...) has been:
``` error: No package matches 'ghostscript-x11' ```
I'll check to see if that is still what is causing issues. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/409
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` that dep issue is no longer the case. I just ran a local compose and it pulled in:
``` ghostscript-x11-9.22-4.fc28.x86_64 (fedora-rawhide) ```
I'll check today's run and see if it works. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/409
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` ok my local run worked using the rawhide content on the mirrors, but the rawhide run from today failed. I grabbed the [repo](https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180118.n...) that was used in the rawhide run and I **do** observe the failure locally when using that repo.
``` # rpm-ostree compose tree --repo=/root/repo --cachedir=/var/sharedfolder/cache/rpm-ostree /var/sharedfolder/code/pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/fedora-ostree-workstation.json Previous commit: ad32a189497cd9a07a4c6328e1c7222ef3fd593715dac23a19d6e5c1b4119be1 Enabled rpm-md repositories: Fedora-Rawhide-20180118.n.0-Workstation-20180118165553
Updating metadata for 'Fedora-Rawhide-20180118.n.0-Workstation-20180118165553': [=================================================================================================] 100% rpm-md repo 'Fedora-Rawhide-20180118.n.0-Workstation-20180118165553'; generated: 2018-01-18 09:20:23
Importing metadata [==============================================================================================================================================================] 100% error: No package matches 'ghostscript-x11' [root@rpm-ostree repo]# ```
still investigating ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/409
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` ok so it turns out that `ghostscript-x11` is not pulled into the [Workstation repo](https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180118.n...). This probably happened around the time of [this change](https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ghostscript/c/fe7ddccb2635e55c391b3f1a798...) to the ghostscript package. However, in investigating this it seems as if there are a host of other packages that aren't in the Workstation repo either. Here is the list:
I think we would be better served by just using the Everything repo to compose the Atomic Workstation composes rather than trying to fight comps.
``` ======================================================================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size^ ======================================================================================================================================================================== Upgrading:^M criu x86_64 3.7-3.fc28 updates 461 k^ ghostscript-core x86_64 9.22-4.fc28 updates 48 k^ ghostscript-x11 x86_64 9.22-4.fc28 updates 77 k^ gnupg2-smime x86_64 2.2.4-1.fc28 updates 277 k^ google-noto-emoji-color-fonts noarch 20170928-1.fc28 updates 6.4 M^ hardlink x86_64 1:1.3-4.fc28 updates 28 k^ iproute-tc x86_64 4.14.1-4.fc28 updates 382 k^ libsss_autofs x86_64 1.16.0-7.fc28 updates 85 k^ libsss_sudo x86_64 1.16.0-7.fc28 updates 84 k^ oci-register-machine x86_64 0-5.13.git66691c3.fc28 updates 1.1 M^ oci-systemd-hook x86_64 1:0.1.15-1.git2d0b8a3.fc28 updates 37 k^ pigz x86_64 2.4-1.fc28 updates 77 k^ pinentry-gtk x86_64 1.1.0-1.fc28 updates 52 k^ protobuf-c x86_64 1.3.0-2.fc28 updates 36 k^ python-systemd-doc x86_64 234-4.fc28 updates 166 k^ rpm-plugin-systemd-inhibit x86_64 4.14.1-1.fc28 updates 68 k^ sane-backends-drivers-cameras x86_64 1.0.27-9.fc28 updates 55 k^ setroubleshoot x86_64 3.3.14-4.fc28 updates 138 k^ setroubleshoot-plugins noarch 3.3.9-3.fc28 updates 345 k^ setroubleshoot-server x86_64 3.3.14-4.fc28 updates 402 k^ sssd-nfs-idmap x86_64 1.16.0-7.fc28 updates 81 k^ sssd-proxy x86_64 1.16.0-7.fc28 updates 111 k^ systemd-bootchart x86_64 233-1.fc28 updates 67 k^ timedatex x86_64 0.5-2.fc28 updates 31 k^ Installing dependencies:^M ghostscript-tools-fonts x86_64 9.22-4.fc28 updates 51 k^ ghostscript-tools-printing x86_64 9.22-4.fc28 updates 51 k^ webkit2gtk3-plugin-process-gtk2 x86_64 2.19.6-1.fc28 updates 10 M^ ^M Transaction Summary^M ======================================================================================================================================================================== ``` ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/409
walters added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Right, the comps thing is serious self-inflicted pain, see e.g. https://pagure.io/workstation-ostree-config/issue/38#comment-464585 and below.
The worst part is that again in Fedora we don't actually *use* those "rpm-md subset" repositories for anything today, the only thing "productized" is the Everything repo.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/409
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` PR: https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/499 ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/409
ngompa added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` Those subset repositories need to die. IMO, they don't serve any useful purpose. They also artificially reduce the total available package set for these things, don't they? ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/409
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
Those subset repositories need to die. IMO, they don't serve any useful purpose. They also artificially reduce the total available package set for these things, don't they?
conversation going on in https://pagure.io/pungi-fedora/pull-request/499 ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/409
mattdm added a new comment to an issue you are following: ``
Those subset repositories need to die. IMO, they don't serve any useful purpose. They also artificially reduce the total available package set for these things, don't they?
No, they don't, because at runtime, everything uses Everything.
As I understand it, they were created to give us more flexibility when we were forming the Editions plan, but we haven't really done anything to take advantage of them — and in fact because they're created on the fly at the last minute as part of a single compose, they don't even give us the ability to, say, release Server but delay workstation for a day or anything. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/409
dustymabe added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` This is fixed now:
``` [root@localhost ~]# rpm-ostree status State: idle Deployments: rawhide:fedora/rawhide/x86_64/workstation Version: Rawhide.20180218.n.0 (2018-02-18 19:52:08) Commit: bf6a8cdd93e3ab8cc77063fa4f9de976afae95c12de66cc573fb5c8cc84b5b78 ```
Closing this issue. ``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/409
The status of the issue: `no rawhide atomic workstation ostree composes for a month` of project: `atomic-wg` has been updated to: Closed as Fixed by dustymabe.
atomic@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Colin Walters -
Dusty Mabe
-
Matthew Miller
-
Neal Gompa
-
Pete Walter