[AutoQA] #251: Move autotest applications into /usr/*bin
by fedora-badges
#251: Move autotest applications into /usr/*bin
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
Reporter: jlaska | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: Packaging, Review, & Deployment
Component: packaging | Keywords:
-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------
The autotest package should supply binaries in /usr/bin/ ... so we can
rely on PATH and not have to call autotest with the full-path
(/usr/share/autotest/client/bin/autotest) when scheduling jobs in
'/usr/bin/autoqa'.
Alternatively, the autotest package could drop a script that updates PATH
appropriately into /etc/profile.d/autotest. But yuck.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/251>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
11 years, 7 months
rats_install and rats_sanity need a new maintainer
by Kamil Paral
Hongqing used to maintain rats_install and rats_sanity tests. Because he has left, we need to find a new maintainer or remove the tests.
- rats_sanity has some minor scheduling issues, I'm working on it just now. Apart from that it shouldn't be a problematic test.
- rats_install is currently broken, and we can start fixing it only after anaconda releases some new compose (with serial console install included). This is a problematic test and will probably require lots of maintenance (according to anaconda changes throughout the Branched period).
Tao, do you feel like taking Hongqing's former responsibilities? Is there any other volunteer?
11 years, 8 months
[AutoQA] #414: rats_install: run twice, once for updates, once for updates+updates-testing
by fedora-badges
#414: rats_install: run twice, once for updates, once for updates+updates-testing
--------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: kparal | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: Nice to have soon
Component: tests | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
--------------------------+-------------------------------
We decided it would be beneficial to run rats_install twice. Once for
stable updates only, once for main+updates, once for main+updates+updates-
testing. Currently we're running just the second option. The discussion is
here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20120319#t15:55:42
Change rats_install to execute twice and report both variants. The easiest
way is probably to modify 'control' file to execute the job twice and
modify some input argument to distinguish the two cases. Also we need to
change the summary accordingly so that we can easily distinguish that in
our ResultsDB view.
Marking "Nice to have soon" if we can do it before F17 Final, otherwise
it'll probably go into "Future tasks".
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/414>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
11 years, 8 months
[AutoQA] #427: Purge unneeded files in autotest results dir
by fedora-badges
#427: Purge unneeded files in autotest results dir
-------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: kparal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: Finger Food
Component: production | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
-------------------------+-------------------------
Currently we have a script that periodically traverses through autotest
results dir and compresses too large files. Also we use tmpwatch to remove
too old results. But we still sometimes have problems with disk space and
number of inodes on our servers. Autotest stores large number of files in
each result directory. By cleaning those we don't want we can save
resources, speed up execution of maintenance scripts and potential
debugging (like grepping through results).
Let's create a script that would traverse the results directory
periodically and remove unneeded files. It would also compress large
files, so it would call or merge the existing script.
If we look into an example results dir:
http://autoqa-stg.fedoraproject.org/results/100310-autotest/qa07.qa/
I believe we need to keep:
{{{
/control
/debug/*.DEBUG
/host_keyvals
/keyval
/rpmguard/debug/*.DEBUG ("rpmguard" is a dynamic test name here)
/rpmguard/keyval
/rpmguard/results
/rpmguard/status
/status.log
/sysinfo/installed_packages
/sysinfo/uname
}}}
The rest of it can be deleted.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/427>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
11 years, 8 months
[AutoQA] #157: conflicts: requested arch not respected
by fedora-badges
#157: conflicts: requested arch not respected
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
Reporter: kparal | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: tests | Version: 1.0
Keywords: |
--------------------+-------------------------------------------------------
This is a bug in the potential_conflict.py script in tests/conflicts/.
Usage suggests using --arch options for specifying requested architecture
to be tested. But if you look at the attached log, the first and second
output match (that's correct), but the third doesn't match, even though it
should. Everything was tested on x86_64 machine.
Also from the usage line it is not clear whether --arch is related only to
particular yum repository selection (replacing $basearch keyword), or
whether it also relates to packages built for one architecture but being
in different repo (e.g. i686 packages are very often in x86_64 repo).
I have looked into the source code of the script and it seems that the
--arch option is not used at all, just printed out in the usage help??
Seth, you're listed as script author. Any comments on that? Thanks.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/157>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
11 years, 8 months
[AutoQA] #424: Add F17 machines and update F15 machines
by fedora-badges
#424: Add F17 machines and update F15 machines
-------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: kparal | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Nice to have soon
Component: production | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
-------------------------+-------------------------------
F15 will be EOL soon. We need to upgrade those test clients. Also we have
none F17 test machines ATM. We need to have some of them.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/424>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
11 years, 8 months
[AutoQA] #421: depcheck: KeyError: 'strong_requires'
by fedora-badges
#421: depcheck: KeyError: 'strong_requires'
-----------------------+------------------------
Reporter: kparal | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: Hot issues
Component: tests | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
-----------------------+------------------------
Since I updated our staging machines, a lot of these depcheck crashes
appeared:
{{{
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./depcheck", line 112, in <module>
profile=opts.profile)
File "/usr/share/autotest/tests/depcheck/depcheck_lib.py", line 394, in
depcheck_main
test_dir=temp_dir, accepted_dir=acc_dir)
File "/usr/share/autotest/tests/depcheck/depcheck_lib.py", line 352, in
do_depcheck
(r, problems) = y.resolveDeps()
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 855, in
resolveDeps
CheckDeps, checkinstalls, checkremoves, missing =
self._resolveRequires(errors)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 984, in
_resolveRequires
thisneeds = self._checkInstall(txmbr)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/depsolve.py", line 1051, in
_checkInstall
oldreqs.extend(oldpo.returnPrco('strong_requires'))
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/yum/sqlitesack.py", line 385, in
returnPrco
if isinstance(self.prco[prcotype], tuple):
KeyError: 'strong_requires'
}}}
http://autoqa-
stg.fedoraproject.org/results/69597-autotest/virt26.qa/depcheck/results/f17
-updates-testing-.html
http://autoqa-
stg.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/frontend/search?type=Testcase&terms=depcheck
I suspect the problem is in updated yum. I see these crashes only on
virt26 and virt27, which are F16 machines. It does not happen on qa06 and
qa07, which are F15 machines. Also it does not seem to manifest on virt05,
which is F16 machine but has an old yum.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/421>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project
11 years, 8 months
