On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 04:09 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
Oh, this starts to be really complicated :) My idea was one config file per binary package.
per binary pkg? Why per binary pkg?
I have no experience with package maintenance, but different Fedora releases of the same package are represented just by different git branches, right? So if that need occurs, there should be no problem in keeping different config file versions for f13 and el5 branch, am I right?
that's correct - hence my suggestion.
The main difference is just that I propose to include that file directly in that binary package. That means AutoQA doesn't have to download it from anywhere, and (more importantly) arbitrary rpmlint run produces the same result as our AutoQA run -- of course just if this feature is supported in upstream rpmlint.
That would mean every pkg gets an addition of the rpmlint config file? EVERY pkg?
Why?
-sv