Re: AutoQA wiki front page

[James Laska]

On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 13:06 -0500, James Laska wrote:
>  On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 10:44 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
>  > ----- "James Laska" <jlaska(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  > 
>  > > 
>  > > I've adjusted your suggested page slightly and posted for review at
>  > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/Draft.  Let me know what
>  > > you
>  > > think.
>  > > 
>  > 
>  > The bullet points are probably easier to read than my continuous 
>  > text.
>  > 
>  > In "Getting involved", splitting it between developer and administrator
>  > is good. I would move a few links, for example you have to install
>  > autotest (at least client) to have autoqa, so it doesn't really fit 
>  > for me to have "install autotest" in administrator section, when you
>  > have whole "install autoqa" in developer section. But that will be
>  > worked out when we have enough documentation.
>  
>  Yeah I agree, that wiki page doesn't yet exist.  We'll likely need a
>  page that addresses bullet#4.1 of
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AutoQA_Use_Cases#Getting_Started_with_AutoQA.
>  
>  I know we've got a few pieces of code still coming to facilitate that,
>  but once that has landed hopefully we can outline the steps needed by
>  test developers to write the tests.
>  
>  > What I am missing is a section for a user, who:
>  > * doesn't want to develop test
>  > * doesn't want to run autoqa instance
>  > * just wants to see the results, subscribe to some of them, read some
>  > details how tests works, how often are results updates, etc - the 
>  > general info
>  > That was what I called "end user" in my version of front page (probably
>  > not a good name). I think we should have some info prepared also for
>  > them. 
I've updated my draft with some links targeting the user you've
suggested.  I'd like to keep the page to as close to 1 page height of
information as much as possible.  Any larger, and my eyes start wonder.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jlaska/Draft

I'd almost like to clean it up further, but I could use feedback on the
current content.

Thanks,
James