Re: [AutoQA] #326: Create user-facing documentation for depcheck
#326: Create user-facing documentation for depcheck
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner: tflink
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: 0.5.0
Component: documentation | Resolution:
Keywords: |
---------------------------+------------------------------------------------
Comment (by jlaska):
Replying to [comment:1 tflink]:
I've written some initial documentation for Depcheck on the
fedoraproject wiki:
Looking good, thanks for taking this one Tim. I made a few
[https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=AutoQA_tests%2FDepcheck&a...
wiki/wording changes], please feel free to accept or reject.
In the section ''Fixing Failures'', it mentions adding or removing
dependencies. Would it make sense to include an example of each of those
scenarios in the ''Understanding failures''?
Also, the suggested resolution ''Remove missing dependencies'' seems
odd,
but I might not be in the right mindset. How do you remove something that
is missing? Should it read, ''Remove incorrect dependencies'' instead?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/326#comment:2>
AutoQA <http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project