On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:44:08 -0700
Tim Flink <tflink(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 10:24:51 -0700
Tim Flink <tflink(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> There was discussion about where qa development related emails
> should go and whether we should create a new qa-devel list for qa
> tools discussion or just use autoqa-devel@.
>
> Instead of doing either of those, I propose that we depreciate the
> autoqa-devel@ list and move everything related to qa development
> (autoqa, blocker tracking app, any other tools) to a new qa-devel@
> list. It keeps development discussion off of test@ and doesn't
> create another mailing list for people to keep track of since many
> of us are involved in more than one area of qa devel.
The feedback thus far has been positive, so I'd like to get this done
in the next couple of days - if you have any objections, please speak
up soon - I'll start the migration process on Thursday morning (US
time) otherwise.
I requested a new mailing list and the request has now gone through.
I'm in the process of adding all the autoqa-devel@ subscribers to the
new list - you should be seeing a mail from the new qa-devel@ list
shortly.
Once we get the trac instances pointing to the new list, we can start
the process of depreciating this list.
Tim