Re: [PATCH] keep control files on dry run
Oh, oh, still learning. I didn't separate the headers from body text
by one empty line, so first half of my message is missing. Recreating
that part from memory:
Hello,
this patch implies --keep-control-file when --dry-run is used. The
--dry-run itself is great, but you usually see in the output only
lines like these:
(continue reading quoted part)
----- "Kamil Páral" <kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
/usr/share/autotest/client/bin/autotest --verbose -t
post-repo-update:repoclosure.x86_64 /tmp/autoqa-control.O1kKrU
To really inspect what will be run (which is the reason why you run
dry) you
still need to inspect the control file. Therefore I think the
--dry-run should
quite conveniently also imply the --keep-control-file (which is a
little long
option to have to type it everytime).
What do you think, should I commit it or not?
_______________________________________________
autoqa-devel mailing list
autoqa-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/autoqa-devel