On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:44:49 -0500 (EST) Kamil Paral kparal@redhat.com wrote:
There was discussion about where qa development related emails should go and whether we should create a new qa-devel list for qa tools discussion or just use autoqa-devel@.
Instead of doing either of those, I propose that we depreciate the autoqa-devel@ list and move everything related to qa development (autoqa, blocker tracking app, any other tools) to a new qa-devel@ list. It keeps development discussion off of test@ and doesn't create another mailing list for people to keep track of since many of us are involved in more than one area of qa devel.
Thoughts?
I agree.
Can Fedora Infra just rename the mailing list, so that all the history, settings and member list is kept intact?
I asked the same question a couple of weeks ago and the problem with moving a mailing list is that all of the existing links to archives on that list would be broken. From what I understand, creating a new list is a better way forward.
It shouldn't be too hard to extract the membership list of autoqa-devel@ and add it to the new list unless there are objections to doing so.
Tim