On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 04:44:49 -0500 (EST)
Kamil Paral <kparal(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> There was discussion about where qa development related emails
> should go and whether we should create a new qa-devel list for qa
> tools discussion or just use autoqa-devel@.
>
> Instead of doing either of those, I propose that we depreciate the
> autoqa-devel@ list and move everything related to qa development
> (autoqa, blocker tracking app, any other tools) to a new qa-devel@
> list. It keeps development discussion off of test@ and doesn't
> create another mailing list for people to keep track of since many
> of us are involved in more than one area of qa devel.
>
> Thoughts?
I agree.
Can Fedora Infra just rename the mailing list, so that all the
history, settings and member list is kept intact?
I asked the same question a couple of weeks ago and the problem with
moving a mailing list is that all of the existing links to
archives on that list would be broken. From what I understand, creating
a new list is a better way forward.
It shouldn't be too hard to extract the membership list of
autoqa-devel@ and add it to the new list unless there are objections to
doing so.
Tim