#308: depcheck: Handle packages with "Conflicts:" declarations better than
just
failing them
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: tflink | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: Package Update Acceptance Test Plan
Component: core | Keywords:
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
In a recent
[
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/82955-autotest/qa03.c.fedoraproje...
test for mediawiki on f13], depcheck rejected the updated because it
conflicted with pho-common.
The package conflicts with php-common because of a "Conflicts: php-common
= 5.3.1" in the spec file for mediawiki starting with 1.16.2-56
([
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=mediawiki.git;a=blob;f=mediawiki....
current spec file])
I can't imagine that this is the only package with a "Conflicts:"
declaration and I don't think that we should be just failing packages like
that. Maybe the "Conflicts:" should be checked somewhere, I'm just
thinking that it should be somewhere other than depcheck.
--
Ticket URL: <
https://fedorahosted.org/autoqa/ticket/308>
AutoQA <
http://autoqa.fedorahosted.org>
Automated QA project