On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 04:09 -0500, Kamil Paral wrote:
----- "Josef Skladanka" <jskladan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Although I do not really understand all the spec files & makefile
> magic,
Me neither.
> it seems OK to me, and I do completely support the idea of not
> packaging
> the israwhide broken.
I'm another big supporter :)
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Laska" <jlaska(a)redhat.com>
>
> Comments/concerns?
kparal@kparal:/home/autoqa (master)$ git am < patch
Applying: Drop israwhidebroken sub-package
error: patch failed: Makefile:32
error: Makefile: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0001 Drop israwhidebroken sub-package
Maybe the patch was based upon a different version of Makefile (than the one
currently in master)?
Oh oops, I thought I applied it against master, but I may have goofed.
I'll inspect later today.
I think we should also ensure that the latest code (source code and
spec
file/Makefile stuff) is available in the 'israwhidebroken' branch, so we
can easily revive this stuff if needed without searching in git history
too much. (I just tried it, it merges cleanly with master, so no problem there).
That's a good idea. Thanks for pulling that into the other branch.
Thanks,
James