HTML results and highlight links

[James Laska]

Greetings,

I finally found a depcheck failure report that I could use to checkout
some of the coolness coming in autoqa-0.5.0.  First off, these results
look *so* much better than text/plain reports, and it's really easy to
find the failure information.  Nice work on 0.5.0!

I was talking to jskladan about the links (>>) in the highlight section.
The character is small, and it didn't occur to me that it was a
clickable link at first.  We discussed changing the link to make it more
obvious that it is intended to be clicked.  I mocked up a few basic
samples and Joza suggested I send them to the list for feedback.

http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/libreport-2.0.3-1.fc.html

Any preferences?

Thanks,
James

[Kamil Paral]

> Greetings,
>
> I finally found a depcheck failure report that I could use to checkout
> some of the coolness coming in autoqa-0.5.0. First off, these results
> look *so* much better than text/plain reports, and it's really easy to
> find the failure information. Nice work on 0.5.0!
>
> I was talking to jskladan about the links (>>) in the highlight
> section.
> The character is small, and it didn't occur to me that it was a
> clickable link at first. We discussed changing the link to make it
> more
> obvious that it is intended to be clicked. I mocked up a few basic
> samples and Joza suggested I send them to the list for feedback.
>
> http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/libreport-2.0.3-1.fc.html
>
> Any preferences?

Great input, I agree. I would use something like "[view >>]" or "[show me >>]".

[James Laska]

On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:44 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> Great input, I agree. I would use something like "[view >>]" or "[show me >>]".

I updated the sample output with those suggestions.

http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/libreport-2.0.3-1.fc.html

Thanks,
James

[Kamil Paral]

> On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:44 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > Great input, I agree. I would use something like "[view >>]" or
> > "[show me >>]".
>
> I updated the sample output with those suggestions.
>
> http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/libreport-2.0.3-1.fc.html
>
> Thanks,
> James

Pushed as b548626a024389dbe7b7d6857012fd09494b19f1 .
I went for "[view >>]" keyword.

[James Laska]

On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 09:12 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:44 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Great input, I agree. I would use something like "[view >>]" or
> > > "[show me >>]".
> >
> > I updated the sample output with those suggestions.
> >
> > http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/libreport-2.0.3-1.fc.html
> >
> > Thanks,
> > James
>
> Pushed as b548626a024389dbe7b7d6857012fd09494b19f1 .
> I went for "[view >>]" keyword.

I like it!  Thank you :)

-James

[Vitezslav Humpa]

> I finally found a depcheck failure report that I could use to checkout
> some of the coolness coming in autoqa-0.5.0. First off, these results
> look *so* much better than text/plain reports, and it's really easy to
> find the failure information. Nice work on 0.5.0!
>
> I was talking to jskladan about the links (>>) in the highlight
> section.
> The character is small, and it didn't occur to me that it was a
> clickable link at first. We discussed changing the link to make it
> more
> obvious that it is intended to be clicked. I mocked up a few basic
> samples and Joza suggested I send them to the list for feedback.
>
> http://jlaska.fedorapeople.org/libreport-2.0.3-1.fc.html
>
> Any preferences?

True, I should have used a better character before. Although now I really
like "[»]" in your mockup!

Vita