Re: [PATCH 0/3] multihook patchset - completion

[Kamil Paral]

----- "Will Woods"  wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 13:04 +0200, Kamil Páral wrote:
> > This is the remaining part of the multihook patchset. Now all raised
>
> exceptions
> > should be reported as CRASHED, together with a short exception
>
> description in
> > the summary. All tests were modified not to use exceptions for
>
> ending
> > correctly.
> >
> > All this code is also available in multitests branch, so it's enough
>
> to just
> > merge the whole branch.
>
> All the patches look good to me. Merged into master. Thanks a lot!

Great, thanks!
> I think James may be working on rolling this into a new (0.4.5?)
> autoqa
> release shortly.

0.4.1 would seem more appropriate to me :)
> -w
>
> autoqa-devel mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/autoqa-devel

[PATCH 0/3] multihook patchset - completion

[Will Woods]

On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 16:57 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> 0.4.1 would seem more appropriate to me :)

Given the significant behavior change across all tests - deprecating
exceptions on error - I thought it might be a good idea to bump the
version a little higher. In the end it's basically cosmetic, anyway.

-w

[PATCH 0/3] multihook patchset - completion

[James Laska]

On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 17:04 -0400, Will Woods wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 16:57 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > 0.4.1 would seem more appropriate to me :)
>
> Given the significant behavior change across all tests - deprecating
> exceptions on error - I thought it might be a good idea to bump the
> version a little higher. In the end it's basically cosmetic, anyway.

Apologies, I ended up just pushing v0.4.1-1 [1] mainly because I pushed
before reading this thread.  In addition to an autoqa.spec change,
several changes were needed to get israwhidebroken building on
fedora-14.

Jobs are processing now.  I've also converted 2 test clients to
fedora-13/i386 systems (with help from mmcgrath).

It appears the upgradepath test isn't working correctly still [2].  I
haven't had time to debug this failure yet.  So a follow-up update will
likely be coming.

Thanks,
James

[1]
http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=autoqa.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/v0.4.1-...
[2]
https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-results/2010-September/035502.html