OK, gang, here it comes:
I created new git branch 'new_koji_watcher':
<
http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=autoqa.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/new...
The information from first email
<
https://fedorahosted.org/pipermail/autoqa-devel/2010-December/001441.html...
still applies, although the batch part should be fixed (i.e. runs on my testing machine)/
Feel free to comment/throw stones :)
Joza
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kamil Paral" <kparal(a)redhat.com>
To: "AutoQA development" <autoqa-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org>
Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 2:31:24 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome /
Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: Re: PATCH proposal - new Koji watcher
----- "Josef Skladanka" <jskladan(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Thanks Kamil, that will teach me to post patches on late fridays :)
/me hates typos & is fixing the patch right now
Do you think it would be better to push the changes into new git
branch,
Yes, yes, yes! :)
I encourage everyone with medium or large-size patch to also push it to some
branch if possible. It's just much easier to switch to that code, there are
no "cannot apply patch" problems and one can fix typos right away, if desired.
OTOH this might be overkill for smaller patches.
or should I send yet another huuuuge patch?
Of course in-line patches are still a good idea, even if you have published
it in a branch, since it's easy to comment on specific parts of code this way.
J.
_______________________________________________
autoqa-devel mailing list
autoqa-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/autoqa-devel