February 2014 - bigdata - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Will Benton

This one might be a little more involved than the last couple. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071495 best, wb

10 years, 1 month

2
1
0 / 0

Oozie up for review

by Robert Rati

Oozie is ready for review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1071456 Rob

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fwd: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline

by Matthew Farrellee

if you have any Changes for F21... -------- Original Message -------- Subject: PRDs/Tech Specs to formal Change Proposals and Change submission deadline Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 05:32:14 -0500 (EST) From: Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik(a)redhat.com> Reply-To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To: devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, Discussions about development for the Fedora desktop <desktop(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>, Fedora Environment and Stacks Working Group mailing list <env-and-stacks(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> Hi, at yesterday's FESCo meeting, it was agreed on setting deadlines for Change submission for Fedora 21 [1] and to process PRDs into Change proposals. "AGREED: Fedora Changes Process submission deadline for system-wide changes is April 7th. Deadline for true standalone changes will be sometime later than that. Changes to how fedora is produced for fedora.next are still due on March 3rd. (+7,0,0) (nirik, 18:29:42)" Current deadlines: * March 3rd: Technical Specifications for products & and changes needed for products and deliverables --- very soon! * April 7th: System Wide Changes submission deadline Working Groups teams, please, try to "transform" required changes for your products from PRDs/Technical Specifications into standalone Change proposals (between March 3rd and April 7th). It will help us to scope the release. Also all changes would be trackable the standard way we do it and it's going to help transparency (as Change announcements are being to be part of the process). Self Contained Changes submission deadline will be set later, after the System Wide deadline. If you expect your proposed Self Contained Change will be on the edge and could be escalated to the System Wide, please try to submit it as early as possible too. As some Fedora.next details will be clarified later in the process, System Wide Changes submitted after the deadline will be approved case by case, even after submission deadline. For the details about the Change process, see my previous email to the devel announce list [2]. Thank you for your help with Change process and let me know in case of any questions. Jaroslav [1] https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1178 [2] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2014-February/00... _______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce(a)lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

review request: lancer

by Will Benton

I can't imagine that I will ever send out a more straightforward review request than this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070436 Thanks for taking a look! best, wb

10 years, 2 months

2
1
0 / 0

Bringing Hadoop to Fedora – Hadoop Summit 2014 North America: Community Choice Now Open!

by Peter MacKinnon

Help send me to San Jose! I hear it's lovely there in June. https://hadoopsummit.uservoice.com/forums/242807-hadoop-deployment-operat... -- Peter MacKinnon MRG Grid/Big Data Red Hat Inc. Raleigh, NC

10 years, 2 months

2
2
0 / 0

FYI - Hadoop 2.3.0 updating dependencies

by Matthew Farrellee

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9991 via @steveloughran

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

another easy review

by Will Benton

Gil had an initial spec for this package, but I've substantially reworked it to use sbt (which is the upstream build method): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069399 I expect this review will be very easy. thanks, wb

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

FTBFS: hadoop

by NoReply

The following package(s) failed to build from source: Package hadoop (6563482): i686 (6563501): root.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3501/6563501/root.log build.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3501/6563501/build.log state.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3501/6563501/state.log mock_output.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3501/6563501/mock_output.log x86_64 (6563500): root.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3500/6563500/root.log build.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3500/6563500/build.log state.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3500/6563500/state.log mock_output.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/3500/6563500/mock_output.log -- This is an automated message. To submit feedback or report any problems, write to <java-maint at redhat>.

10 years, 2 months

3
2
0 / 0

FTBFS: hadoop

by NoReply

The following package(s) failed to build from source: Package hadoop (6558483): i686 (6558495): root.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/8495/6558495/root.log build.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/8495/6558495/build.log state.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/8495/6558495/state.log mock_output.log : http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/work/tasks/8495/6558495/mock_output.log -- This is an automated message. To submit feedback or report any problems, write to <java-maint at redhat>.

10 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

easy review task

by Will Benton

If anyone has some free cycles to review json4s soon, I'd appreciate it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1067664 I anticipate this will be a pretty easy review. best, wb

10 years, 2 months

2
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

bigdata February 2014