On Jul 07 01:33, Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 07/05/2014 01:51 PM, Howard Johnson wrote:
> Fortunately, the split between the rpkg core and the <vendor>pkg wrapper
> means that replacing various rpkg core methods is fairly simple, based
> on my recollection of looking at the code in the past (when implementing
> another <vendor>pkg wrapper).
I believe its this functionality that Brian is trying to exploit, plus
having the option of multiple backends cant be bad.
Definitely. The replacement and redefinition of rpkg methods is really slick.
However, it would be nice to push some generality upward into rpkg (without
breaking the way it works currently for fedpkg of course). That would let 3rd
party sites call rpkg's methods with configurable options rather than
copy-pasting rpkg's code into the redefinition.
bstinson(a)ksu.edu | IRC: bstinson | Bitbucket/Twitter: bstinsonmhk