On 03/07/2011 10:37 PM, seth vidal wrote:
>
> Anyway, I don't have strong opinions either way, changing it to be the
> way you suggested (and I discussed in the other mentioned mail) would be
> a matter of not touching the config files and rewording the related
> "deprecated" comment in code.
I see - sorry.
I'd say drop the config file changes and leave the rest and maybe not
call it deprecated but a supported mode that occasionally creates
problems
Committed like that.