-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:13 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
>> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 10:12 -0400, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> I hate to throw water on the fire, but to me XML-RPC seems like a
>>> sledgehammer. There's actually a ton of code in xmlrpclib.py and for
>>> this specific instance of pushing status information back to a
>>> controlling process, I think it's somewhat heavy-handed.
>> And I'll just pick this point in the thread to say that I agree with
>> dcbw here.... KISS goes a long way. And while we can say that it's
>> configurable and you enable it if you want or don't if not -- that's
>> then two code paths for status to have to keep working and ensure we
>> don't break as well as maintaining them for some time
>>
> So where were you guys when I was playing Horatius at the bridge? :)
>
I'd like to take this opportunity to point to
lesscode.org
thanks,
-sv
Thanks for that link.
Clark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEoVjaHyuj/+TTEp0RAudxAJ49NekRv0HFiauK1OP7ya1+MQD0twCdHLS7
ymeHY1y8p9TE6179JYvhcjY=
=Zums
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----