Re: Fedora 7 kickstart problem: WORKAROUND

[Sergio Monteiro Basto]

On Wed, 2007-07-25 at 11:07 -0600, Phil Meyer wrote:
>  Phil Meyer wrote:
>  > Jesse Keating wrote:
>  >> On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 10:16:40 -0600
>  >> Phil Meyer <pmeyer(a)themeyerfarm.com&gt; wrote:
>  >>
>  >>  
>  >>> Sorry for the slow response.  Had to finish Harry Potter. :)
>  >>>
>  >>> After verifying the yum is 3.2.2 all the way through, still no change.
>  >>>     
>  >>
>  >> Can I hazard a guess that you're doing a media installation?  (burned
>  >> iso, or qemu booting from the iso, or NFS iso dir)?
>  >>
>  >>   
>  >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >>
>  >> -- 
>  >> Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
>  >> Fedora-buildsys-list(a)redhat.com
>  >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list
>  >
>  > Yes.  I found this work around:
>  >
>  > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246357#c26
>  >
>  > Am testing that right now.
>  The workaround suggested in comment 26 works.
>  
>  Basically, in the yum configuration file you are using to build, tell it 
>  to ignore updates for yum and yum-updatesd.  Like this:
>  
>  [updates]
>  name=Fedora $releasever - $basearch - Released Updates
>  ...
>  exclude=yum yum-updatesd
>  enabled=1
>  gpgcheck=1
>  
>  
>  It does not matter what version of yum is on the build server, just what 
>  version is built into the CD/DVD image.
>  
>  The new version of yum in updates-testing is 3.2.2 and does not resolve 
>  the issue.
>  
>  Further Observations:
>  
>  In yum-3.2.0 on the CD/DVD image, both headers directories are created.
>  /tmp/cache/headers
>  /tmp/cahe/anaconda.../headers
>  
>  The second of those is populated.
>  
>  Good Luck! 

Hi , we know the regression is between yum-3.2.0 and yum-3.2.1 , so
shouldn't be difficult , find and revert what make stop population of
headers . I simply don't had time to further investigation.

Someone write in this malling list that could be fix (the missing
headers) on anaconda what is the status of anaconda ? 

thanks, 

-- 
Sérgio M.B.