On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 11:20 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wednesday 06 December 2006 04:24, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> I checked iso/pkgorder-ia64. It didn't have bash. I retried pkgorder
> manually, the output still didn't include bash. Then, I move all rpm from
> Fedora to Fedora/RPMS, and reran pkgorder. The new result had bash.
Interesting. Sounds like maybe anaconda in FC6 isn't quite setup to handle
things under Fedora/ rather than Fedora/RPMS. I'll talk with the anaconda
folks. Unfortunately I haven't been able to duplicate this when spinning
x86_64 releases.
After moving RPM files to Fedora/RPMS, the pkgorder result is
correct, and
directory os-disc1/Fedora/RPMS also has rpm bash, but the installation from
the new images still reports lots of %post and %pre errors.
/root/install.log showed anaconda didn't follow the sequence produced by
pkgorder to install rpms. I checked os-disc1/repodata/primary.xml.gz and the
rpm sequence was exatcly the same sequence of pkgorder.
Yanmin
--
Fedora-buildsys-list mailing list
Fedora-buildsys-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-buildsys-list