On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:17 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-06-27 at 12:07 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:
>> I'm not wedded to the names or the methodology (that's just how we
>> tend to manage branches in my group).
>
> My feeble brain has a hard time grasping a branch _from_ 0.6 named
> mock-0-6-branch. Wouldn't we want to name it something that is post
> 0.6?
I just look at it as a branch that began life at 0.6. I suppose it
makes more sense as HEAD progresses on to other versions.
... and additional releases from the branch can become 0.6.1, 0.6.2, etc
Makes perfect sense to me.
Jeremy