On Dec 23, 2008, at 4:31 PM, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
2008/12/23 Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com>:
> On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 14:53 -0500, Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
>> 2008/12/23 Jesse Keating <jkeating(a)redhat.com>:
>>> On Tue, 2008-12-23 at 08:01 -0600, Joe Nall wrote:
>>>> Sorry, I wasn't clear. Not an interactive install.
>>> Doesn't matter. Put the packages in the ks file you feed pungi and
>>> they'll wind up in the compose, regardless if they get used later.
>> Would this require a second ks file that omits the package name, for
>> the automated install, so that it will be on the media, but not
>> actually installed by default?
> There is no requirement that the ks file you use to compose is the
> ks file you use to install. In fact, them being so is somewhat
> as if you have a local mirror, just do your installs over the
> instead of doing a compose and then installing from media.
I got the impression that Joe Nall was trying to use the same ks file.
Hence i asked, so we could all be clear on the details. :)
Old school testers like DVDs :)