8:27 a.m.
Hello all,
we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
same for Pulp and Candlepin.
Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
--
Later,
Lukas #lzap Zapletal
9:04 a.m.
On 08/28/2014 09:27 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
Hello all,
we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
same for Pulp and Candlepin.
Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
+1
Candlepin would probably run in i386, but we really don't focus on it.
--
jesus m. rodriguez | jesusr(a)redhat.com
principal software engineer | irc: zeus
red hat systems management | 919.754.4413 (w)
rhce # 805008586930012 |
+---------------------------------------------+
| "Those who cannot remember the past |
| are condemned to repeat it." |
| -- George Santayana |
+---------------------------------------------+
10:15 a.m.
New subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
Hi, Dropping i386 would be a problem for Pulp. We currently support i386 for RHEL 5.
-Barnaby
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lukas Zapletal" <lzap(a)redhat.com>
To: foreman-dev(a)googlegroups.com, candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org, pulp-list(a)redhat.com
Cc: "Jan Blazek" <jblazek(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:27:56 AM
Subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
Hello all,
we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
same for Pulp and Candlepin.
Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
--
Later,
Lukas #lzap Zapletal
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
10:19 a.m.
New subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
Is it difficult to add more space to koji.katello.org? I'm trying to determine if its
a matter of cost, or if there is technical complexity.
-Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lukas Zapletal" <lzap(a)redhat.com>
To: foreman-dev(a)googlegroups.com, candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org, pulp-list(a)redhat.com
Cc: "Jan Blazek" <jblazek(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:27:56 AM
Subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
Hello all,
we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
same for Pulp and Candlepin.
Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
--
Later,
Lukas #lzap Zapletal
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
10:34 a.m.
New subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
it is non trivial but can be done, there is also cost as well.
50% of the storage on the box is for i386 external repositories needed
to support the builds (200+GB out of 360GB). We can keep them if they
are required but it looked like a quick win if it was something we
didn't need.
Mike
On 08/28/2014 08:19 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
Is it difficult to add more space to koji.katello.org? I'm trying
to determine if its a matter of cost, or if there is technical complexity.
-Brian
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lukas Zapletal" <lzap(a)redhat.com>
> To: foreman-dev(a)googlegroups.com, candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org,
pulp-list(a)redhat.com
> Cc: "Jan Blazek" <jblazek(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:27:56 AM
> Subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
>
> Hello all,
>
> we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
> easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
> dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
>
> Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
> same for Pulp and Candlepin.
>
> Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
>
> --
> Later,
> Lukas #lzap Zapletal
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
--
Mike McCune
mmccune AT redhat.com
Red Hat Engineering | Portland, OR
Systems Management | 650-254-4248
10:50 a.m.
New subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
I believe the only platform Pulp is actively supporting i386 for is RHEL 5. If we are
maintaining i386 repositories for platforms other than RHEL 5 I we can get rid of them
from Pulp's perspective.
-Barnaby
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike McCune" <mmccune(a)redhat.com>
To: "Brian Bouterse" <bbouters(a)redhat.com>, "Lukas Zapletal"
<lzap(a)redhat.com>
Cc: foreman-dev(a)googlegroups.com, candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org, pulp-list(a)redhat.com,
"Jan Blazek" <jblazek(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:34:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
it is non trivial but can be done, there is also cost as well.
50% of the storage on the box is for i386 external repositories needed
to support the builds (200+GB out of 360GB). We can keep them if they
are required but it looked like a quick win if it was something we
didn't need.
Mike
On 08/28/2014 08:19 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
Is it difficult to add more space to koji.katello.org? I'm trying
to determine if its a matter of cost, or if there is technical complexity.
-Brian
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lukas Zapletal" <lzap(a)redhat.com>
> To: foreman-dev(a)googlegroups.com, candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org,
pulp-list(a)redhat.com
> Cc: "Jan Blazek" <jblazek(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:27:56 AM
> Subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
>
> Hello all,
>
> we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
> easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
> dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
>
> Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
> same for Pulp and Candlepin.
>
> Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
>
> --
> Later,
> Lukas #lzap Zapletal
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
--
Mike McCune
mmccune AT redhat.com
Red Hat Engineering | Portland, OR
Systems Management | 650-254-4248
_______________________________________________
Pulp-list mailing list
Pulp-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
9:12 a.m.
New subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
excellent, we have f19-i386 which is eating up 90+GB.
Lukas, should we just ... delete it?
On 08/28/2014 08:50 AM, Barnaby Court wrote:
I believe the only platform Pulp is actively supporting i386 for is
RHEL 5. If we are maintaining i386 repositories for platforms other than RHEL 5 I we can
get rid of them from Pulp's perspective.
-Barnaby
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike McCune" <mmccune(a)redhat.com>
To: "Brian Bouterse" <bbouters(a)redhat.com>, "Lukas Zapletal"
<lzap(a)redhat.com>
Cc: foreman-dev(a)googlegroups.com, candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org, pulp-list(a)redhat.com,
"Jan Blazek" <jblazek(a)redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 11:34:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
it is non trivial but can be done, there is also cost as well.
50% of the storage on the box is for i386 external repositories needed
to support the builds (200+GB out of 360GB). We can keep them if they
are required but it looked like a quick win if it was something we
didn't need.
Mike
On 08/28/2014 08:19 AM, Brian Bouterse wrote:
> Is it difficult to add more space to koji.katello.org? I'm trying to determine if
its a matter of cost, or if there is technical complexity.
>
> -Brian
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Lukas Zapletal" <lzap(a)redhat.com>
>> To: foreman-dev(a)googlegroups.com, candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org,
pulp-list(a)redhat.com
>> Cc: "Jan Blazek" <jblazek(a)redhat.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 9:27:56 AM
>> Subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
>> easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
>> dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
>>
>> Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
>> same for Pulp and Candlepin.
>>
>> Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Later,
>> Lukas #lzap Zapletal
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-list mailing list
>> Pulp-list(a)redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list(a)redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
10 a.m.
New subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
On 08/29/2014 10:12 AM, Mike McCune wrote:
excellent, we have f19-i386 which is eating up 90+GB.
Lukas, should we just ... delete it?
I am still not convinced that we don't need the 386 builds. I think we
should wait for a major Pulp version to remove them, like 3.0. I don't
believe we are simply copying all the files. For example, we build
mod_wsgi - that is not Python code, it's C.
10:11 a.m.
New subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
I agree with Randy, We need 32bit builds for pulp on F19 and F20. If you are wanting to
remove the F19-i386 repository will the F19-i686 library be maintained?
-Barnaby
----- Original Message -----
From: "Randy Barlow" <rbarlow(a)redhat.com>
To: "Mike McCune" <mmccune(a)redhat.com>, "Barnaby Court"
<bcourt(a)redhat.com>
Cc: pulp-list(a)redhat.com, foreman-dev(a)googlegroups.com, "Jan Blazek"
<jblazek(a)redhat.com>, candlepin(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 11:00:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
On 08/29/2014 10:12 AM, Mike McCune wrote:
excellent, we have f19-i386 which is eating up 90+GB.
Lukas, should we just ... delete it?
I am still not convinced that we don't need the 386 builds. I think we
should wait for a major Pulp version to remove them, like 3.0. I don't
believe we are simply copying all the files. For example, we build
mod_wsgi - that is not Python code, it's C.
11:26 a.m.
New subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
On 08/28/2014 09:27 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
same for Pulp and Candlepin.
Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
Hello,
Koji is broken for us because the 386 builds were dropped. I don't think
we ever gave the confirmation that this e-mail was requesting, unless I
missed some e-mails (possible). Either way, this is blocking us from
making today's build, so it's very important that we bring these 386
builds back ASAP.
For example, see this build that failed for us today:
http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=149839
Please bring the 386 targets back and let us know when they are ready
for us to build again. Thanks!
5:47 p.m.
New subject: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
On 09/04/2014 09:26 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
On 08/28/2014 09:27 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
> easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
> dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
>
> Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
> same for Pulp and Candlepin.
>
> Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
Hello,
Koji is broken for us because the 386 builds were dropped. I don't think
we ever gave the confirmation that this e-mail was requesting, unless I
missed some e-mails (possible). Either way, this is blocking us from
making today's build, so it's very important that we bring these 386
builds back ASAP.
For example, see this build that failed for us today:
http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=149839
Please bring the 386 targets back and let us know when they are ready
for us to build again. Thanks!
I'm restoring the i386 repositories, may take several hours as it is
~60G of data.
Mike
--
Mike McCune
mmccune AT redhat.com
Red Hat Engineering | Portland, OR
Systems Management | 650-254-4248
5:54 p.m.
New subject: [foreman-dev] Re: [Pulp-list] Dropping i386 arch from koji.katello.org
How much space will we have after restoring?
On Sep 4, 2014 6:47 PM, "Mike McCune" <mmccune(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/04/2014 09:26 AM, Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 08/28/2014 09:27 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
>
>> we are having troubles with free space on koji.katello.org and the
>> easiest way of resolving this is not adding more space but rather
>> dropping i386 external repositories (Fedora, EPEL, RHEL).
>>
>> Foreman and Katello do not build against this arch and I suppose the
>> same for Pulp and Candlepin.
>>
>> Please confirm and we are good to go, thanks.
>>
>
> Hello,
>
> Koji is broken for us because the 386 builds were dropped. I don't think
> we ever gave the confirmation that this e-mail was requesting, unless I
> missed some e-mails (possible). Either way, this is blocking us from
> making today's build, so it's very important that we bring these 386
> builds back ASAP.
>
> For example, see this build that failed for us today:
>
> http://koji.katello.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=149839
>
> Please bring the 386 targets back and let us know when they are ready
> for us to build again. Thanks!
>
>
I'm restoring the i386 repositories, may take several hours as it is ~60G
of data.
Mike
--
Mike McCune
mmccune AT redhat.com
Red Hat Engineering | Portland, OR
Systems Management | 650-254-4248
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"foreman-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to foreman-dev+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
3583
days inactive
3590
days old
candlepin@lists.fedorahosted.org
11 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Barnaby Court -
Brian Bouterse -
Eric D Helms -
jesus rodriguez -
Lukas Zapletal -
Mike McCune -
Randy Barlow