Thanks Miro,
The false positives come from the fact that we gathered the requests data
of Testing Farm, a final check
to check if that corresponds with the current state would get rid of those
false positives.
I will not more spend now more time on it, I believe it is only a few
occasions.
But thanks for taking the time and looking into it.
Best regards,
/M
On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 1:02 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 25. 08. 22 19:46, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I wanted to follow up on this question you had on DevConf.US 22 [1].
>
> We would like to make these stats available to the community,
unfortunately now
> it is just a DB query to our Testing Farm database.
>
> So, currently that is: 449 packages
>
> I am attaching lists for proof.
I recognize some false positives in the list:
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pypy
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-packaging
The packages use STI, not TMT.
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pypy3
This package is retired on all branches, cannot use anything, used STI
before,
not TMT.
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dotenv
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-requests
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-shellingham
>
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-urllib3
The TMT tests were removed ~1 year ago.
There might be more such cases, I only checked a handful of packages I
know or
co-maintain.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
--
Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE
IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252
Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o