On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:11:13AM -0400, Ari LiVigni wrote:
> -== @ri ==-
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:08 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou@pingoured.fr>
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:05:06AM -0400, Ari LiVigni wrote:
> >Â Â -== @ri ==-
> >Â Â On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 8:47 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> <pingou@pingoured.fr>
> >Â Â wrote:
> >
> >Â Â Â On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 02:41:41PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> >Â Â Â > On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 02:06:32PM +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
> >Â Â Â > > Hi there,
> >Â Â Â > >
> >Â Â Â > > Is the CI pipeline running on Fedora and gating? It's
> really hard to
> >Â Â Â > > find test results.
> >Â Â Â > >
> >Â Â Â > > I'm looking around both in Bodhi:
> >Â Â Â >
> >Â Â Â > >
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018- 5c64b23a18
> >Â Â Â >
> >Â Â Â > Will look into this one
> >
> >Â Â Â And the answer is easy: the CI pipeline does not run for F28:
> >Â Â Â https://jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.org/
> >
> >Â Â That is incorrect and Johnny reported the status last week to
> multiple
> >Â Â lists and people:
> >Â Â
> https://jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.org/job/ upstream-fedora-f28-pipeline/
> >Â Â I will make it more visible on the default viewÃ*Â
>
> This is the allpackages pipeline not the Atomic CI one, no?
>
> But this will get the Atomic ones and the non-atomic ones so not seeing
> your point. Before we were only focused on Atomic in a compose ostree,
> now we do all packages with regular compose and image for f27 and f28.
My point is that they are two different pipeline sending different topics and
thus on the consuming side, they are treated differently. In this case, the
ci.pipeline is used for gating, the allpackages one not yet.
Pierre
_______________________________________________
CI mailing list -- ci@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ci-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org