1:30 p.m.
On Wed, 2019-11-20 at 08:57 +0100, Michal Srb wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 8:07 PM Adam Williamson <adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-11-13 at 10:17 +0100, Fabien Boucher wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to introduce a CI/CD workflow for Fedora distgits around
> > Pull Requests my team and I have started to develop.
>
> Are the results of these tests reported to resultsdb? Does this flow
> publish messages to fedora-messaging or fedmsg? Are either of those
> things done in ways that are compatible with the several existing
> implementations of "test stuff for a Fedora build/update/compose"
> (Taskotron, "the pipeline", openQA, autocloud...)
>
Just curious, is the whole "test stuff for a Fedora build/update/compose
..." documented somewhere?
It's all documented *somewhere*, but there isn't exactly a central Here
Are All The Things That Test Stuff, mainly because there isn't really a
central team or plan or vision or anything. 'Fedora CI' is one thing
run by one bunch of people, Taskotron and openQA are both run by Fedora
QA (so we do have some pages which cover both and the relation between
them), autocloud was maintained by someone else and is now not really
maintained by anyone, and now this thing seems to have come along from
yet another bunch of folks...
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net