Thanks Miro,

The false positives come from the fact that we gathered the requests data of Testing Farm, a final check

to check if that corresponds with the current state would get rid of those false positives.

I will not more spend now more time on it, I believe it is only a few occasions.

But thanks for taking the time and looking into it.

Best regards,

/M

On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 1:02 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@redhat.com> wrote:

On 25. 08. 22 19:46, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> I wanted to follow up on this question you had on DevConf.US 22 [1].
>
> We would like to make these stats available to the community, unfortunately now
> it is just a DB query to our Testing Farm database.
>
> So, currently that is: 449 packages
>
> I am attaching lists for proof.


I recognize some false positives in the list:


 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pyproject-rpm-macros
 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pypy
 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-packaging

The packages use STI, not TMT.



 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pypy3

This package is retired on all branches, cannot use anything, used STI before,
not TMT.


 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-dotenv
 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-requests
 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-shellingham
 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-urllib3

The TMT tests were removed ~1 year ago.



There might be more such cases, I only checked a handful of packages I know or
co-maintain.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok

--

Miroslav Vadkerti :: Senior Principal QE :: Testing Farm / Linux QE

IRC mvadkert #tft #tmt #osci :: Mobile +420 773 944 252

Remote Czech Republic :: Red Hat Czech s.r.o