Hi folks,
As you may know we provide Zuul CI [1] for some Fedora projects and packages [2],[3]. We are running this CI For Fedora for more than one year and we see that the platform and jobs are pretty stable. This CI is part of a wider CI platform that the Software Factory project is maintaining for various projects like RDO [4]. We have some free capacity and we would like to provide more CI to Fedora especially for distgit repos.
Since a previous improvement [5], attaching a distgit repository to Fedora Zuul CI is easier and does not require any project maintainer action.
A Pull-Request is proposed here [6] to activate the CI on 148 distgit repos (the sorted list of the distgit names is here [7]). Each distgit part of this list has received at least 2 new PRs during the last two months (source datagrepper).
So we would like to know if Fedora maintainers and contributors will be happy to get Zuul CI feedback on those repositories ? Here is an example of a run of the default distgit CI jobs for rpms/python3.10 [8].
Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?
We will be glad to include more repositories to that list regularly.
Regards, Fabien
1 - https://zuul-ci.org/ 2 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci 3 - https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status 4 - https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status 5 - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci@lists.fedoraproject.org/thr... 6 - https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff 7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/ 8 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10/pull-request/9
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:15 PM Fabien Boucher fboucher@redhat.com wrote:
Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?
That looks great. Yes, please.
The last package on the list is mine and there's a typo there; should be rpms/zathura-pdf-mupdf.
P
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:34 PM Petr Šabata contyk@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:15 PM Fabien Boucher fboucher@redhat.com wrote:
Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?
That looks great. Yes, please.
The last package on the list is mine and there's a typo there; should be rpms/zathura-pdf-mupdf.
Ah sorry, this is a copy/paste issue. In the real config file the name is ok: https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff
P _______________________________________________ CI mailing list -- ci@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ci-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Fabien,
I have a feeling that people who don't have CI enabled on their repositories yet, probably don't hang around here, on this mailing list. So forwarding the email to the devel list might be worth the shot :)
Thanks, Michal
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:15 PM Fabien Boucher fboucher@redhat.com wrote:
Hi folks,
As you may know we provide Zuul CI [1] for some Fedora projects and packages [2],[3]. We are running this CI For Fedora for more than one year and we see that the platform and jobs are pretty stable. This CI is part of a wider CI platform that the Software Factory project is maintaining for various projects like RDO [4]. We have some free capacity and we would like to provide more CI to Fedora especially for distgit repos.
Since a previous improvement [5], attaching a distgit repository to Fedora Zuul CI is easier and does not require any project maintainer action.
A Pull-Request is proposed here [6] to activate the CI on 148 distgit repos (the sorted list of the distgit names is here [7]). Each distgit part of this list has received at least 2 new PRs during the last two months (source datagrepper).
So we would like to know if Fedora maintainers and contributors will be happy to get Zuul CI feedback on those repositories ? Here is an example of a run of the default distgit CI jobs for rpms/python3.10 [8].
Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?
We will be glad to include more repositories to that list regularly.
Regards, Fabien
1 - https://zuul-ci.org/ 2 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci 3 - https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status 4 - https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status 5 - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci@lists.fedoraproject.org/thr... 6 - https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff 7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/ 8 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10/pull-request/9 _______________________________________________ CI mailing list -- ci@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ci-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci@lists.fedoraproject.org
Thanks Michal for the advice, I'll forward the mail on the devel ml.
Cheers, Fabien
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 8:25 PM Michal Srb msrb@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Fabien,
I have a feeling that people who don't have CI enabled on their repositories yet, probably don't hang around here, on this mailing list. So forwarding the email to the devel list might be worth the shot :)
Thanks, Michal
On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:15 PM Fabien Boucher fboucher@redhat.com wrote:
Hi folks,
As you may know we provide Zuul CI [1] for some Fedora projects and packages [2],[3]. We are running this CI For Fedora for more than one year and we see that the platform and jobs are pretty stable. This CI is part of a wider CI platform that the Software Factory project is maintaining for various projects like RDO [4]. We have some free capacity and we would like to provide more CI to Fedora especially for distgit repos.
Since a previous improvement [5], attaching a distgit repository to Fedora Zuul CI is easier and does not require any project maintainer action.
A Pull-Request is proposed here [6] to activate the CI on 148 distgit repos (the sorted list of the distgit names is here [7]). Each distgit part of this list has received at least 2 new PRs during the last two months (source datagrepper).
So we would like to know if Fedora maintainers and contributors will be happy to get Zuul CI feedback on those repositories ? Here is an example of a run of the default distgit CI jobs for rpms/python3.10 [8].
Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?
We will be glad to include more repositories to that list regularly.
Regards, Fabien
1 - https://zuul-ci.org/ 2 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci 3 - https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status 4 - https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status 5 - https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci@lists.fedoraproject.org/thr... 6 - https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff 7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/ 8 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10/pull-request/9 _______________________________________________ CI mailing list -- ci@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ci-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci@lists.fedoraproject.org
CI mailing list -- ci@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to ci-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/ci@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Fabien Boucher -
Michal Srb -
Petr Šabata