More distgit attached to Fedora Zuul CI ?

[Fabien Boucher]

Hi folks,

As you may know we provide Zuul CI [1] for some Fedora projects and
packages [2],[3]. We are running this CI For Fedora for more than one year
and we see that the platform and jobs are pretty stable. This CI is part of
a wider CI platform that the Software Factory project is maintaining for
various projects like RDO [4]. We have some free capacity and we would like
to provide more CI to Fedora especially for distgit repos.

Since a previous improvement [5], attaching a distgit repository to Fedora
Zuul CI is easier and does not require any project maintainer action.

A Pull-Request is proposed here [6] to activate the CI on 148 distgit repos
(the sorted list of the distgit names is here [7]). Each distgit part of
this list has received at least 2 new PRs during the last two months
(source datagrepper).

So we would like to know if Fedora maintainers and contributors will be
happy to get Zuul CI feedback on those repositories ?
Here is an example of a run of the default distgit CI jobs for
rpms/python3.10 [8].

Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?

We will be glad to include more repositories to that list regularly.

Regards,
Fabien

1 - https://zuul-ci.org/
2 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci
3 - https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status
4 - https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status
5 -
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/thr...
6 - https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff
7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/
8 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10/pull-request/9

[Petr Šabata]

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:15 PM Fabien Boucher  wrote:
> Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?

That looks great. Yes, please.
> 7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/

The last package on the list is mine and there's a typo there; should
be rpms/zathura-pdf-mupdf.

P

[Fabien Boucher]

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 1:34 PM Petr Šabata  wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:15 PM Fabien Boucher  wrote:
> > Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?
>
> That looks great. Yes, please.
> > 7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/
>
> The last package on the list is mine and there's a typo there; should
> be rpms/zathura-pdf-mupdf.

Ah sorry, this is a copy/paste issue. In the real config file the name is
ok: https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff
> P
> _______________________________________________
> CI mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]

[Michal Srb]

Hi Fabien,

I have a feeling that people who don't have CI enabled on their
repositories yet, probably don't hang around here, on this mailing list.
So forwarding the email to the devel list might be worth the shot :)

Thanks,
Michal

On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:15 PM Fabien Boucher  wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> As you may know we provide Zuul CI [1] for some Fedora projects and
> packages [2],[3]. We are running this CI For Fedora for more than one year
> and we see that the platform and jobs are pretty stable. This CI is part of
> a wider CI platform that the Software Factory project is maintaining for
> various projects like RDO [4]. We have some free capacity and we would like
> to provide more CI to Fedora especially for distgit repos.
>
> Since a previous improvement [5], attaching a distgit repository to Fedora
> Zuul CI is easier and does not require any project maintainer action.
>
> A Pull-Request is proposed here [6] to activate the CI on 148 distgit
> repos (the sorted list of the distgit names is here [7]). Each distgit part
> of this list has received at least 2 new PRs during the last two months
> (source datagrepper).
>
> So we would like to know if Fedora maintainers and contributors will be
> happy to get Zuul CI feedback on those repositories ?
> Here is an example of a run of the default distgit CI jobs for
> rpms/python3.10 [8].
>
> Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?
>
> We will be glad to include more repositories to that list regularly.
>
> Regards,
> Fabien
>
> 1 - https://zuul-ci.org/
> 2 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci
> 3 - https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status
> 4 - https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status
> 5 -
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/thr...
> 6 - https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff
> 7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/
> 8 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10/pull-request/9
> _______________________________________________
> CI mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]

[Fabien Boucher]

Thanks Michal for the advice, I'll forward the mail on the devel ml.

Cheers,
Fabien

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 8:25 PM Michal Srb  wrote:
> Hi Fabien,
>
> I have a feeling that people who don't have CI enabled on their
> repositories yet, probably don't hang around here, on this mailing list.
> So forwarding the email to the devel list might be worth the shot :)
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2020 at 2:15 PM Fabien Boucher  wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > As you may know we provide Zuul CI [1] for some Fedora projects and
> > packages [2],[3]. We are running this CI For Fedora for more than one year
> > and we see that the platform and jobs are pretty stable. This CI is part of
> > a wider CI platform that the Software Factory project is maintaining for
> > various projects like RDO [4]. We have some free capacity and we would like
> > to provide more CI to Fedora especially for distgit repos.
> >
> > Since a previous improvement [5], attaching a distgit repository to
> > Fedora Zuul CI is easier and does not require any project maintainer action.
> >
> > A Pull-Request is proposed here [6] to activate the CI on 148 distgit
> > repos (the sorted list of the distgit names is here [7]). Each distgit part
> > of this list has received at least 2 new PRs during the last two months
> > (source datagrepper).
> >
> > So we would like to know if Fedora maintainers and contributors will be
> > happy to get Zuul CI feedback on those repositories ?
> > Here is an example of a run of the default distgit CI jobs for
> > rpms/python3.10 [8].
> >
> > Let us know if you think we can activate the CI for those projects ?
> >
> > We will be glad to include more repositories to that list regularly.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Fabien
> >
> > 1 - https://zuul-ci.org/
> > 2 - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zuul-based-ci
> > 3 - https://fedora.softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/status
> > 4 - https://review.rdoproject.org/zuul/status
> > 5 -
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]/thr...
> > 6 - https://pagure.io/fedora-project-config/pull-request/116#request_diff
> > 7 - https://softwarefactory-project.io/paste/show/1892/
> > 8 - https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python3.10/pull-request/9
> > _______________________________________________
> > CI mailing list -- [e-mail]
> > To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>
> CI mailing list -- [e-mail]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]