cloud June 2014

cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

29 participants
68 discussions

[cloud] #71: libmicrohttpd is back as a systemd dependency
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#71: libmicrohttpd is back as a systemd dependency --------------------+-------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Keywords: --------------------+-------------------- This was gone from F20 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908081) but is back now. As noted in this bug, it is undesirable because libmicrohttpd pulls in gnutls (and nettle) , which is not otherwise on the base image. Reducing the number of crypto libraries there by default reduces the need to respin off-cycle security updates -- this is not an abstract concern. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/71> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 2

[cloud] #60: Enable serial console for bootloader
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#60: Enable serial console for bootloader ---------------------+-------------------- Reporter: fabiand | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Keywords: ---------------------+-------------------- The bootloader of the current cloud images is not attached to a serial console. Please change this, so we can also follow the bootloader part on the serial console, i.e. for test automation. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/60> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 5

[cloud] #53: anaconda doesn't allow installation of current fedora-cloud-base.ks
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#53: anaconda doesn't allow installation of current fedora-cloud-base.ks ---------------------+-------------------- Reporter: walters | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Keywords: ---------------------+-------------------- Cloud images are expected to come with: * root password locked * No user precreated; instead, an agent (cloud-init, min-metadata-service) pull config data from the hypervisor and inject ssh keys, create users, etc. The problem is Anaconda's user.py is a mandatory step. A suggested hack is to set a root password, then unset it in %post. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/53> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 2

[cloud] #44: hey we should have a vagrant base box
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#44: hey we should have a vagrant base box --------------------+-------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Keywords: --------------------+-------------------- This is a very long-standing request. Here is a ticket for it. :) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/44> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 14

[cloud] #23: File F21 change: Re-factor cloud-init
by Nobody 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#23: File F21 change: Re-factor cloud-init ------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Feature Deadline) Component: Cloud Base Image | Keywords: ------------------------------+------------------------------------------ '''Summary:''' Cloud Init was initially designed for a different distribution and is only loosely tailored for our needs. As it stands, it pulls in a rather large set of packages not used for other things. It is also written in Python, itself a large subsystem which it would eventually be nice to leave out of the base. Effort is moderate, with some low- hanging fruit which may be addressed easily. '''Importance:''' vital long term, but just moderate for F21 (We really need this, but if we don't get work it now, it's in acceptable shape for this release.) '''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha, or F22 / if we don't make alpha with changes, this can go in next release. '''Scope:''' Self-contained '''Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/23> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

2 15

[cloud] #34: External need: batched updates
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#34: External need: batched updates --------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Flock 2014 Component: --- | Keywords: --------------------+------------------------ '''Summary:''' We want to produce updated images on a monthly cadence. It would be nice if we could produce those from QA'd bunches of packages. '''Importance:''' moderate (it will be hard to implement image refresh without this, but we could do it) '''Timeframe:''' F21 release + 1 month / Obviously better if we get things lined up earlier '''Fedora Sub-Project/SIG:''' Primarily QA, but Rel Eng and Infrastructure too. This is pretty big. ''' Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD (this probably needs someone actively contributing to initial and ongoing work) See the related Change proposal "(A)Periodic Updates to the Images" http://flock2013.sched.org/event/8c4f702e42814598e0e4e31b188a0ae6 What's this ticket about? We need an owner for this — someone to drive it forward. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/34> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 2

[cloud] #38: Automatic Smoketests on Image Build
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#38: Automatic Smoketests on Image Build --------------------------+------------------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Alpha) Component: Testing & QA | Keywords: --------------------------+------------------------------- '''Summary:''' When a new image is built in Koji, automatically boot it and run a basic matrix of tests. '''Importance:''' moderate (worst case, we can keep doing this by hand) '''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha / Want to reduce manual test workload '''Fedora Sub-Project/SIG:''' QA and the Taskotran project '''Cloud SIG owner:''' Sandro Mathys https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Taskotron -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/38> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 6

[cloud] #25: File F21 change: OpenShift Out-of-the-Box Image
by Nobody 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#25: File F21 change: OpenShift Out-of-the-Box Image --------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Feature Deadline) Component: OpenShift Origin | Keywords: Image | --------------------------------+------------------------------------------ '''Summary:''' Fedora Cloud agreed to make a base image plus several tailored to specific purposes. This is one of the tailored ones — OpenShift ready to run. '''Importance:''' nice to have (if we fail to do it, we are not any worse- off than we are now, and OpenShift can still be installed on the base iamge.) '''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha / If it's not ready for alpha, we have missed this release '''Scope:''' self-contained (in collaboration with OpenShift developers) '''Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenShift_Out-of-the- Box_Cloud_Image -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/25> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

2 2

[cloud] #28: discuss modularized SELinux policy packaging
by Nobody 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#28: discuss modularized SELinux policy packaging ------------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Cloud Base Image | Keywords: ------------------------------+----------------------- Possible F22 feature? Summary: Monolith SELinux policy has rules for everything that could exist, not just that which is installed. Possible room for reduction here. '''Importance:''' nice-to-have '''Timeframe:''' F21 or F22 / This is not low-hanging fruit. '''Scope:''' self-contained (SELinux) ''' Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD (No Feature filed at this time -- discuss with SELinux policy maintainers) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/28> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

2 1

[cloud] #57: get official images uploaded into Rackspace
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#57: get official images uploaded into Rackspace -------------------------------------------------+------------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 Component: Infrastructure & Release | (Final) Engineering | Keywords: -------------------------------------------------+------------------------- Work with Rackspace engineers... they don't yet have public image sharing, but getting our official images uploaded to a fedora account as part of the release process would be a good start. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/57> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cloud June 2014