docker-io distgit repo on our github account?
by Sam Kottler
We put cloud-init on GitHub as a mirror of Fedora's git repo to gain
visibility and encourage contributions. How do people feel about doing
the same for the docker-io repo?
-s
9 years, 6 months
Cloud SIG Meeting Minutes for 2014-06-05
by Matthew Miller
================================
#fedora-meeting: Hello Everybody <-awesome. wrong meetbot command :)
================================
Meeting started by mattdm at 14:00:34 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2014-06-05/cloud.2014-06-...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* skipping a few jzb items because he can't make it today (mattdm,
14:02:08)
* crucial questions on Docker image deliverable (mattdm, 14:04:28)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/65 (mattdm, 14:04:36)
* ACTION: mattdm to post docker-base-as-primary to list as lazy
consensus issue (mattdm, 14:14:05)
* start communication/collaboration on cloud image update (mattdm,
14:21:24)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/51 (mattdm, 14:21:34)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/38 (mattdm, 14:23:27)
* "Automatic Smoketests on Image Build" (mattdm, 14:23:38)
* put cloud tests here
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Roshi/QA/Cloud_Docs/ticket61
(mattdm, 14:24:48)
* HELP: please start writing test ideas and putting them in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Roshi/QA/Cloud_Docs/ticket61
(mattdm, 14:26:19)
* ACTION: roshi to check on taskotron holding credentials (mattdm,
14:27:55)
* walters' local metadata service idea is also interesting because a
lot of tests can be run that way (mattdm, 14:28:19)
* ACTION: frankieonuonga to start writing some test cases (mattdm,
14:34:19)
* Deliverables and release engineering changes for Fedora.Next (mattdm,
14:35:20)
* https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/50 (mattdm, 14:35:25)
* Project Atomic tracker (mattdm, 14:36:48)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/rel-eng/2014-May/017850.html
(mattdm, 14:38:51)
* walters, dilmore, whoever else needed to meet to work on getting
releng/atomic needs met (mattdm, 14:57:14)
* open floor (mattdm, 14:58:01)
* HELP: docs team needs input from us on cloud docs (mattdm,
15:02:06)
* HELP: that includes experts to write the basic contents (mattdm,
15:03:37)
Meeting ended at 15:15:26 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* mattdm to post docker-base-as-primary to list as lazy consensus issue
* roshi to check on taskotron holding credentials
* frankieonuonga to start writing some test cases
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* frankieonuonga
* frankieonuonga to start writing some test cases
* mattdm
* mattdm to post docker-base-as-primary to list as lazy consensus
issue
* roshi
* roshi to check on taskotron holding credentials
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* mattdm (134)
* walters (29)
* roshi (28)
* dgilmore (23)
* number80 (21)
* imcleod (20)
* jsmith (15)
* frankieonuonga (14)
* mattymo (12)
* zodbot (7)
* oddshocks (7)
* geppetto (5)
* scollier (4)
* lsm5 (3)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
9 years, 6 months
meeting agenda items today
by Matthew Miller
Just a reminder -- meeting at 14:00 UTC (about two hours from now).
Meeting items include:
* crucial questions on Docker image deliverable
* start communication/collaboration on cloud image updates
* Process for determining when and why Docker trusted images need to be rebuilt
* next steps on test plan
* Automatic Smoketests on Image Build
* Deliverables and release engineering changes for Fedora.Next
* Project Atomic work tracker
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
9 years, 6 months
proposal: Fedora Cloud Experimental image/spin?
by Matthew Miller
So, we've got the traditional Cloud Base image, and the focused Fedora
Atomic image. (Plus of course the Big Data one, which will build on top of
Cloud Base.)
What if we also have a Fedora Cloud Experimental image? This would be only
rawhide nightlies, with no other releases. And it'd be a place where we
could try out not-ready-for-prime-time ideas like the alternate metadata
services and networkd.
I thought that the Fedora Atomic image would serve this role, but as I'm
thinking about it, and especially as we get closer to actually having
"production" releases of that, I think that while it'll probably _get_ those
experimental things sooner, there's enough going on with Atomic itself that
it'd be better to have a separate place to do the actual experimenting.
What do you think?
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
"Tepid change for the somewhat better!"
9 years, 6 months
[cloud] #16: rename cloud spin kickstart to distinguish the cloud base image
by Nobody
#16: rename cloud spin kickstart to distinguish the cloud base image
--------------------+--------------------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Branch)
Component: --- | Keywords: meeting
--------------------+--------------------------------
I have been calling the new general purpose cloud image "Fedora Cloud
Base" to distinguish it from the Docker image, the Big Data image, and a
potential OpenShift image (if that turns out to not be the Docker one.)
I propose we officially call the general-purpose cloud image (currently,
the only one) "Fedora Cloud Base". And I'm tagging this with the meeting
keyword for ratification.
One behind-the-scenes complication is that the spins process involves
assembling kickstart fragments, one of which is suffixed with "-base.ks"
already, so there is a "cloud-image-base.ks", which would presumably
became "cloud-base-base.ks", which is... awesome? silly? One of those.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/16>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
9 years, 6 months
