cloud July 2014

cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

19 participants
75 discussions

SysAdmin DAY
by Rino Rondan 23 Jul '14

23 Jul '14

En conmemoracion del dia del SysAdmin este Viernes 25, se esta jugando el mundial de Distribuciones: A world cup of OS is playing now!! Red Hat, Fedora and Centos are playing to get a place on semifinal of world cup !! http://www.adminfest.com/stage2.php http://www.adminfest.com/index.php?lang=en Hoy alentemos todos a Fedora,Red Hat y Centos CentOS vs Gentoo 12 a 13:30 (ART) 15 a 16:30 (UTC) Ubuntu vs Red Hat 14 a 15:30 (ART) 17 a 18:30 (UTC) Fedora vs Arch 16 a 17:30 (ART) 19 a 20:30 (UTC) Alentemos a nuestras Distros :), a darle like a la foto de cada distro que aparece en la llave de la pagina, eso los lleva al facebook de la organizacion del evento., tengan en cuenta el horario de votacion esta en ART. Do like on the photo of each distro that you want ( Red Hat, Centos, Fedora..mmm just be free to choose one :) fb : https://www.facebook.com/AdminFest?fref=ts -- --- Rondan Rino Certificado en LPIC-2 <https://cs.lpi.org/caf/Xamman/certification> LPI ID:LPI000209832 Verification Code:gbblvwyfxu Red Hat Certified Engineer -- RHCE -- RHCVA <https://www.redhat.com/wapps/training/certification/verify.html?certNumber=…> Blog:http://www.itrestauracion.com.ar Cv: http://cv.rinorondan.com.ar <http://www.rinorondan.com.ar/> http://counter.li.org Linux User -> #517918 Viva La Santa Federacion!! Mueran Los Salvages Unitarios!! ^^^Transcripcion de la epoca ^^^

1 0

2014-07-23 @ ** 16:00 UTC ** - F21 Blocker Review #3
by Mike Ruckman 21 Jul '14

21 Jul '14

# F21 Blocker Review meeting #3 # Date: 2014-07-23 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net We've got another blocker meeting coming up this week. As of today there are 2 proposed blockers and 1 proposed FE for F21 Alpha (so it should be a shorter meeting). The full list can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/21/alpha/buglist We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate the Alpha Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F21 can be found on the wiki [0]. Product specific plans are still being solidified, but that should be sorted quickly. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting See you tomorrow! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria == // Mike Fedora QA irc: roshi | twitter: roshi_fedora blog: roshi.fedorapeople.org

1 0

Cloud SIG news - week 29
by Haïkel 18 Jul '14

18 Jul '14

Hi folks ! we had to cancel this week's meeting due to the lack of quorum. Let me remind you that Joe (jzb) announced earlier this week a new meeting time after a vote: Fridays @ 17:00 UTC / 13:00 Eastern / 12:00 Central / 10:00 Pacific To find the next meeting time in your local time: date -d "Friday 17:00 UTC" By the way, the Cloud WG had to replace one of its voting member: Andy Grimm -agrimm) had been nominated by the existing members (including Sando Mathys -red_trela- whom he replaces) +7 Welcome Andy and thank you Sandro for your dedication ! :) In place of the weekly meeting, we had an informal meeting in #fedora-cloud, few highlights: * Due to the current poor shape of the hadoop ecosystem packages, the Big Data Image will be delayed, the priority being fixing the packages I suggested that we make it a spin for F21 and the official deliverable rescheduled to F22 * imcleod is moving forward with Rackspace's nova agent, few packaging issues might arises for requirements, but imcleod plans to provide a copr repository anyway and the resulting cloud image will be semi-official * roshi thinks that the tests validation matrix is good enough for testing the upcoming alpha release If you have any news to share with us, feel free ;) Best regards, H.

1 0

[PATCH] Don't enable by default
by Colin Walters 16 Jul '14

16 Jul '14

[ Posting here for increased visibility ] Right now, cloud-init is only installed in the cloud images, so it's OK if it enables itself by default. However, for future Atomic work, we'll likely only have one tree that's also running on bare metal, and that will include cloud-init. This change should be safe because the Fedora Cloud kickstart in spin-kickstarts uses services --enabled=cloud-init. --- cloud-init.spec | 22 ++-------------------- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

3 3

Re: Big Data Image: call for heroes
by Haïkel 16 Jul '14

16 Jul '14

Hi Tim, there's absolutely no problem, I know you have a lot on your plates recently. Let us know, if we could help. I'm fine with putting things on the wiki: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/bigdata/cloudimages best regards, H.

3 5

2014-07-16 @ ** 16:00 UTC ** - F21 Blocker Review #2
by Mike Ruckman 15 Jul '14

15 Jul '14

# F21 Blocker Review meeting #2 # Date: 2014-07-16 # Time: 16:00 UTC (12:00 EST, 09:00 PST) # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's blocker review time again! Now that we're rolling along with the F21 alpha release process we're moving back to regular blocker review meetings. As of today there are 2 proposed blockers and 1 proposed FE for F21 Alpha. The full list can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/21/alpha/buglist We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate the Alpha Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F21 can be found on the wiki [0]. Product specific plans are still being solidified, but that should be sorted quickly. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting See you tomorrow! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria == // Mike Fedora QA irc: roshi | twitter: roshi_fedora blog: roshi.fedorapeople.org

1 0

New and better meeting time!?
by Joe Brockmeier 15 Jul '14

15 Jul '14

Hey all, The Thursday morning meeting is not working so well for some of our schedules. (Particularly mine, alas, as I have a new weekly meeting that's unavoidable.) The next two weeks are a bit hairy as well w/travel, but I hope we can find a time that works well for everybody... http://doodle.com/ui9ny8qruudigq7i Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 2

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by jzb＠fedoraproject.org 15 Jul '14

15 Jul '14

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2014-07-17 from 14:00:00 to 15:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup. Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar//meeting/309/

1 0

Proposed generic release criterion: service manipulation
by Adam Williamson 12 Jul '14

12 Jul '14

Still working on Fedora 21 release criteria. It seems to me that there's one area currently lacking in the criteria which all the Products would probably like us to have, hence I'm proposing it as a new 'generic' criterion, not Product-specific. We still haven't figured out exactly how to present the criteria, so for now I'm proposing this one be added as a new Fedora 21 Alpha criterion, i.e. it goes to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_Alpha_Release_Criteria (under "Post-install requirements"). Here's the proposed criterion: System service manipulation It must be possible to start, stop, enable and disable system services using the initialization framework's standard commands. I don't think it needs any footnotes beyond standard 'References'. Does this seem reasonable to everyone? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

2 2

New Cloud WG member approval: Andy Grimm
by Haïkel 11 Jul '14

11 Jul '14

Hello, Since Sandro Mathys (red_trela) stepped down from the Working Group, we're missing a member. During last week meeting, Andy Grimm (agrimm, fas: arg) candidated to replace him and taking ownership of Sandro's tasks. According our Governance document: "When a position in the group becomes available, that position will be filled by unanimous consent of the existing members." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Governance So we need to get consent from the remaining Cloud WG voting members to get Andy onboard. I suggest we use Apache lazy consensus rule: +1 (approve) +0 (no opinion, but okay) -1 (disapprove) and if there's no -1 before the next meeting, and we reached quorum by then, Andy will be joining us. Let's start voting ! +1 from myself. best regards, H.

7 6

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cloud July 2014