January 2015 - cloud - Fedora mailing-lists

Cloud SIG meeting minutes from 2015/01/21
by Kushal Das 22 Jan '15

22 Jan '15

=================================== #fedora-meeting-1: Fedora Cloud SIG =================================== Meeting started by kushal at 19:01:59 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-01-21/fedora_cloud_s… . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (kushal, 19:02:19) * Action items from last meeting (kushal, 19:08:10) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Vagrant_Box_Atomic (jzb, 19:15:41) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bare_Metal_Atomic (jzb, 19:15:54) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/tunir (kushal, 19:15:55) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Local_Test_Cloud (jzb, 19:16:22) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/report/9 current meeting tickets (kushal, 19:17:11) * support HVM instances in EC2 (#68) (kushal, 19:17:27) * ACTION: oddshocks should get access to the website to update AMI ID(s) (kushal, 19:21:23) * publicize fedora-dockerfiles #84 (kushal, 19:23:12) * Update Timezone for the docker images #91 (kushal, 19:25:17) * ACTION: kushal should commit the new patch for docker kickstart and update #91 (kushal, 19:26:02) * Getting sha256sum published for the cloud images #93 (kushal, 19:26:41) * LINK: http://mirror.pnl.gov/fedora/linux/releases/21/Cloud/Images/x86_64/ (dustymabe, 19:27:43) * Decide whether to update cloud image to not include ruby #09 (kushal, 19:33:34) * Decide whether to update cloud image to not include ruby #90 (kushal, 19:33:37) * Open floor (kushal, 19:35:47) Meeting ended at 20:08:15 UTC. Action Items ------------ * oddshocks should get access to the website to update AMI ID(s) * kushal should commit the new patch for docker kickstart and update #91 Action Items, by person ----------------------- * kushal * kushal should commit the new patch for docker kickstart and update #91 * oddshocks * oddshocks should get access to the website to update AMI ID(s) * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * kushal (109) * jzb (51) * dustymabe (47) * langdon (39) * oddshocks (17) * zodbot (13) * roshi (12) * jsmith (7) * lsm5 (6) * nirik (3) * gholms (2) * scollier (1) * misc (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot Kushal -- Fedora Cloud Engineer CPython Core Developer Director Python Software Foundation http://kushaldas.in

1 0

[PATCH] fedora-atomic-docker-host: Add the docker python module
by Luke Macken 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

Including the docker python client enables people to use Ansible to manage containers. diff --git a/fedora-atomic-docker-host.json b/fedora-atomic-docker-host.json index 2d22efa..784e82f 100644 --- a/fedora-atomic-docker-host.json +++ b/fedora-atomic-docker-host.json @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ "cockpit", "kubernetes", "etcd", "cadvisor", "flannel", - "docker-io"], + "docker-io", + "python-docker-py"], "default_target": "multi-user.target", -- 2.1.0

1 1

[cloud] #90: Decide whether to update cloud image to not include ruby
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 21 Jan '15

21 Jan '15

#90: Decide whether to update cloud image to not include ruby ------------------------------+--------------------- Reporter: ryansb | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: Cloud Base Image | Keywords: meeting ------------------------------+--------------------- Now that heat-cfntools has removed its dep on Ruby, the cloud image should be able to remove it. Should it be rebuilt without ruby, or will users have an expectation that it will always be included? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/90> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 5

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by Dusty Mabe 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2015-01-21 from 19:00:00 to 20:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar//meeting/1999/

1 0

Tomorrow is the last day to submit Fedora 22 feature proposal
by Kushal Das 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

Hi all, Tomorrow is the last day to submit feature proposal for Fedora 22. Please submit your feature proposals using the template[2]. Let us make Fedora in the Cloud world even better :) [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/22/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/EmptyTemplate Kushal -- Fedora Cloud Engineer CPython Core Developer Director Python Software Foundation http://kushaldas.in

1 0

Re: Local DNSSEC resolver and Docker(containers)
by P J P 19 Jan '15

19 Jan '15

Hello Lokesh, > On Monday, 19 January 2015 11:01 AM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > RE: docker, I could probably patch it out at build time to use 127.0.0.1 instead > of google DNS. > Sound good? I doubt if that would suffice. IIUC, the issue is that currently containerised applications have no way to reach 127.0.0.1:53 on the host. We might need a dedicated network interface on the host with a consistent IP plus few iptables(8) rules to direct traffic through. --- Regards -Prasad http://feedmug.com

1 0

Re: Local DNSSEC resolver and Docker(containers)
by P J P 17 Jan '15

17 Jan '15

> On Friday, 16 January 2015 9:27 PM, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote: > We actually don't even need a --dns option if /etc/resolv.conf only has > 127.0.0.1 . Docker will end up using 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4 as the default dns > in such a case: > > https://github.com/docker/docker/blob/master/pkg/networkfs/resolvconf/resol… > > Verified this on my rawhide VPS. If someone else could confirm this as well, > it'd be awesome :) Well, it is good that it has a working fall back option. Yet IMO, it would be better if it could take advantage of the host's DNSSEC resolver at 127.0.0.1:53. --- Regards -Prasad http://feedmug.com

1 0

Re: [atomic-devel] Fedora Activity Day at SCALE (Atomic & Cloud)
by Joe Brockmeier 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

On 01/15/2015 09:56 PM, Jon Stanley wrote: > I'm more than likely going to be at SCaLE this year again, and would > love to participate in this. I'm obviously very interested in Atomic > and what work we can get done on that front, though I see on the > schedule that we're more interested in Kubernetes and Dockerfiles - > which is cool as well. I can help on the latter a bit, not so much the > former (but would LOVE to learn!!) That's a draft, and the schedule can be changed / driven by those who are going to show up. Feel free to add ideas/topics. Glad to know you'll be attending - look forward to seeing you at SCALE! Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 0

Re: Fedora Activity Day at SCALE (Atomic & Cloud)
by Joe Brockmeier 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

On 01/15/2015 10:12 PM, Scott Williams wrote: > Double the FAD, double the fun! Up for some python and docker, too! Who's heading up FAD/Fedora presence for SCALE? I want to make sure we actually have double the room for the FAD... Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

1 0

Local DNSSEC resolver and Docker(containers)
by P J P 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

Hello all, Please see: -> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver -> https://pjps.wordpress.com/2014/05/02/local-dns-resolver-in-fedora/ This is an upcoming F22 feature; it proposes to install a local DNSSEC validating DNS resolver running at 127.0.0.1:53 on Fedora systems. This feature is already available in F21. One can easily run the local DNSSEC enabled resolver by $ sudo yum install dnssec-trigger $ sudo systemctl enable dnssec-triggerd.service $ $ # disable and stop any existing DNS service, e.g., dnsmasq $ sudo systemctl start dnssec-triggerd.service Though it works for most of the use-cases. Docker(or container) applications seem to face problems in accessing the host's DNS resolver at 127.0.0.1:53. I'm no expert on Docker(or container) applications. I was wondering if someone could help in testing Docker(or container) applications with the local DNSSEC validating resolver on F21. Any results from this exercise would be immensely helpful in fixing bugs and sorting out edge cases, thus making the solution robust and ready for F22 release. I'm willing to help in any way I could. As always, your comments and suggestions are most welcome! Thank you. --- Regards -Prasad http://feedmug.com

5 9

Fedora Activity Day at SCALE (Atomic & Cloud)
by Joe Brockmeier 16 Jan '15

16 Jan '15

Draft started here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FAD_SCALE_13x_Sunday_Cloud_and_Atomic This is a call for help and participants. :-) Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

2 3

Can't make the meeting today 01/14
by Dusty Mabe 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

Hi all, I can't make the meeting today. Summary for this past week is: DigitalOcean now has Fedora 21.. woohoo. If there was anything else I was supposed to do let me know about it. I'll read the meeting notes. Dusty

1 0

Size of base Fedora 32 Docker image
by M. Edward (Ed) Borasky 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

I'm starting to build Docker images on the Fedora base and I'm a little concerned about the size of the images. For example, the Debian base is 85.1 MB, the Ubuntu base is 192 MB and the CentOS base is 224 MB. The Fedora base is 250.2 MB and that's *before* I install any application code. Is there any way I can build a smaller base? Ideally I'd like something under 100 MB but even getting it under 200 MB would be worthwhile. -- OSJourno: Robust Power Tools for Digital Journalists http://www.znmeb.mobi/stories/osjourno-robust-power-tools-for-digital-journ… Remember, if you're traveling to Bactria, Hump Day is Tuesday and Thursday.

4 9

[cloud] #66: Create kickstart file
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 14 Jan '15

14 Jan '15

#66: Create kickstart file -------------------------------+------------------------------ Reporter: pfrields | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Beta) Component: Docker Host Image | Keywords: -------------------------------+------------------------------ What: Based on the Base Image's kickstart file, write an extended kickstart file with the image-specifics. Where: kickstart file is at https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/ Why: No kickstart file, no image. When: Before Fedora 21's first release candidates are built. Who: Someone in cloud working group in collaboration with the Spins SIG ''(ported from task list at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/Cloud_ToDo)'' -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/66> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 7

Fedora 21 on Digital Ocean Testing
by Dusty Mabe 13 Jan '15

13 Jan '15

Hey guys/gals, Fedora 21 is now out on Digital Ocean.. before we promote it to the rest of the community I'd like to give you all an opportunity to test a bit. roshi and I have already been giving it some love but it's possible there are things that we missed. You should be able to select the Fedora 21 image now in the DO web interface. If you'd like a $10 credit send me a message in #fedora-cloud. Dusty

4 4

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by Dusty Mabe 12 Jan '15

12 Jan '15

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2015-01-14 from 19:00:00 to 20:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar//meeting/1999/

1 0

2015-01-12 @ 1700 UTC ** Fedora Blocker Review **NEW TIME**
by Mike Ruckman 10 Jan '15

10 Jan '15

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-01-12 # Time: 1700 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net It's that time of week again, time for some Blocker Review! While it might seem like I've lost track of what day it is again (which happens, I admit), we discussed it this week and decided to give Mondays after the QA meeting a try for the blocker review. So, this Monday we'll be having the review at 1700 UTC instead of the normal Wednesday time. We'll be sticking with the new trend of going through all the milestones during this meeting. Currently, accross all the milestones, we have 3 proposed blockers. Hopefully it'll be a short meeting. If you want to take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers, the full list can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ Make sure to click through the milestones to see how many we have before the meeting! We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F22 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting See you Monday! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- // Mike -- Fedora QA freenode: roshi http://roshi.fedorapeople.org

1 0

F21 base AMIs available in both HVM and PV, plus smaller disk size
by David Gay 09 Jan '15

09 Jan '15

Hey nerds, I've got Fedimg properly registering cloud base images as both HVM and PV. (I also added multithreading to the upload process!) Previously, base images were only available as PV. Now, base images are available in both formats. (Atomic images will never be available in PV, as they require HVM). Also, as per a previous thread on this list, I've reduced the disk requirement from 12 GB to our minimum, 3 GB. Attached is a signed text file containing a list of AMIs that were just registered today. I used the official F21 x86_64 base cloud image that we have as the official download on our website. Everything seems to be working for me, but in case I missed something, or if you have something to say, please let me know. -- oddshocks

2 2

Summary from yesterday's Cloud SIG meeting
by Kushal Das 08 Jan '15

08 Jan '15

=================================== #fedora-meeting-1: Fedora Cloud SIG =================================== Meeting started by kushal at 19:01:05 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-01-07/fedora_cloud_s… . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (kushal, 19:01:27) * Action items from last meeting (kushal, 19:04:11) * Regular topics (kushal, 19:07:08) * support HVM instances in EC2 (#68) (kushal, 19:07:34) * ACTION: oddshocks will update #68 when he has something to test. (kushal, 19:09:54) * publicize fedora-dockerfiles (#84) (kushal, 19:11:14) * LINK: http://fedoramagazine.org/fedora-dockerfiles-ready-to-go-recipes-for-easy-a… (langdon, 19:12:54) * ACTION: jzb write "how to use dockerfiles" by next Cloud SIG meeting (jzb, 19:16:11) * ACTION: Kushal will send CI details to scollier and langdon (kushal, 19:28:16) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/84#comment:8 (jzb, 19:28:49) * Update Timezone for the docker images (#91) (kushal, 19:33:23) * ACTION: Kushal to test the patch from lsm5 on docker image timezone. (kushal, 19:34:06) * Decide whether to update cloud image to not include ruby (#90) (kushal, 19:42:22) * Open Floor (kushal, 19:46:06) Meeting ended at 20:00:30 UTC. Action Items ------------ * oddshocks will update #68 when he has something to test. * jzb write "how to use dockerfiles" by next Cloud SIG meeting * Kushal will send CI details to scollier and langdon * Kushal to test the patch from lsm5 on docker image timezone. Action Items, by person ----------------------- * jzb * jzb write "how to use dockerfiles" by next Cloud SIG meeting * langdon * Kushal will send CI details to scollier and langdon * lsm5 * Kushal to test the patch from lsm5 on docker image timezone. * oddshocks * oddshocks will update #68 when he has something to test. * scollier * Kushal will send CI details to scollier and langdon * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * kushal (91) * jzb (46) * langdon (36) * roshi (35) * scollier (34) * dustymabe (17) * zodbot (15) * oddshocks (7) * lsm5 (7) * rtnpro (3) * soumyaC (2) * jsmith (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot Kushal -- Fedora Cloud Engineer CPython Core Developer Director Python Software Foundation http://kushaldas.in

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by Dusty Mabe 05 Jan '15

05 Jan '15

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2015-01-07 from 19:00:00 to 20:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar//meeting/1999/

1 0

Couple of issues - link in wiki page & incorrect AMI IDs
by Richard Fearn 05 Jan '15

05 Jan '15

Hi, This page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud has a link to here: http://cloud.fedoraproject.org/ but that page is outdated and redirects to https://getfedora.org/. It might be better to link directly to the Cloud download page: https://getfedora.org/en_GB/cloud/download/ When I click the "Base Cloud" button on that page, the IDs in the "Ami ID" column don't match the IDs used when clicking the cloud icons. It looks like the IDs in the "Ami ID" column are correct for the final F21 release, but the ones used when actually launching an instance are for the F21 Beta. Regards, Rich -- Richard Fearn richardfearn(a)gmail.com

2 1

Consider adding etcdctl to Fedora Atomic Cloud 21 rpm-ostree
by Steven Dake 01 Jan '15

01 Jan '15

Colin, First off, Nice job on Fedora Atomic - I'm liking what I see :) A fairly complete uOS for container launching. I'm not sure if your aware, but there is no etcdctl in Fedora Atomic Cloud 21 images. This wouldn't be such a big deal, but I don't quite know how to configure flannel without the etcdctl tool. I guess I could work around it possibly using curl, but it sure would be nice if etcdctl were just in by default. Does anyone on the list know how I could use curl to do the same job of configuring flannel? If so, I'd super appreciate the information. The downside is the binary file is 7MB in size. Thoughts? Regards -steve

2 2

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cloud January 2015