#23: File F21 change: Re-factor cloud-init
------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Feature Deadline)
Component: Cloud Base Image | Keywords:
------------------------------+------------------------------------------
'''Summary:''' Cloud Init was initially designed for a different
distribution and is only loosely tailored for our needs. As it stands, it
pulls in a rather large set of packages not used for other things. It is
also written in Python, itself a large subsystem which it would eventually
be nice to leave out of the base. Effort is moderate, with some low-
hanging fruit which may be addressed easily.
'''Importance:''' vital long term, but just moderate for F21 (We really
need this, but if we don't get work it now, it's in acceptable shape for
this release.)
'''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha, or F22 / if we don't make alpha with changes,
this can go in next release.
'''Scope:''' Self-contained
'''Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/23>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#101: Proposed for Fedora 23 - Support for Windows 10 Client Hyper-V
----------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: znmeb | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Docker (Other) | Keywords:
----------------------------+--------------------
I'm currently testing the F22 Project Atomic as a guest on Windows 8.1
Client Hyper-V. I can convert the TC 2 beta qcow2 to vhdx via qemu-img,
boot the disk with the credentials ISO in a Generation 1 Hyper-V guest,
log in as "fedora", sudo to "root" and do a 'docker run' pulling an image
from Docker Hub.
I still need to test browsing to a host-only network adapter from the
Windows desktop but that's just a matter of reading a few more manuals.
And generation 2 VMs don't work and would need to work for this to be
supportable. So I would like to propose supporting this use case in Fedora
23.
I don't have an effort estimate at the moment. A minimum task list so far
would be:
1. Operationalize the conversion from qcow2 to vhdx in the release
process.
2. Get generation 2 machines working. This may have to wait until Windows
10 ships.
3. Define test scenarios and build Windows PowerShell scripts to execute
them.
4. Documentation!
I'll volunteer for 3 and 4 for now - it's on my road map for my remix
anyway.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/101>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#34: External need: batched updates
--------------------+------------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Flock 2014
Component: --- | Keywords:
--------------------+------------------------
'''Summary:''' We want to produce updated images on a monthly cadence. It
would be nice if we could produce those from QA'd bunches of packages.
'''Importance:''' moderate (it will be hard to implement image refresh
without this, but we could do it)
'''Timeframe:''' F21 release + 1 month / Obviously better if we get things
lined up earlier
'''Fedora Sub-Project/SIG:''' Primarily QA, but Rel Eng and Infrastructure
too. This is pretty big.
'''
Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD (this probably needs someone actively contributing
to initial and ongoing work)
See the related Change proposal "(A)Periodic Updates to the Images"
http://flock2013.sched.org/event/8c4f702e42814598e0e4e31b188a0ae6
What's this ticket about? We need an owner for this — someone to drive it
forward.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/34>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#81: Create cloud training materials for ambassadors
-------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Collaboration & Communication | Keywords:
-------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Many Fedora Ambassadors come from a desktop or old-school sysadmin
background. Cloudy concepts are new and foreign. In talking with some of
them, it was suggested that it'd be really, really helpful to have some
basic training materials for our own ambassadors -- what is cloud, why
does it matter, what is Fedora Cloud, what is our strategy, why do _we_
matter, and so on.
http://mattdm.org/fedora/cloud2013/#1 might be a starting point. Maybe
some more interactive training would even be useful.
Of course, it'd also be awesome to get some people from the new modern
world interested in being ambassadors as well -- another direction to
approach the same issue. (But even then, training on what _we_ are doing
would be useful.)
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/81>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#38: Automatic Smoketests on Image Build
--------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Alpha)
Component: Testing & QA | Keywords:
--------------------------+-------------------------------
'''Summary:''' When a new image is built in Koji, automatically boot it
and run a basic matrix of tests.
'''Importance:''' moderate (worst case, we can keep doing this by hand)
'''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha / Want to reduce manual test workload
'''Fedora Sub-Project/SIG:''' QA and the Taskotran project
'''Cloud SIG owner:''' Sandro Mathys
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Taskotron
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/38>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#25: File F21 change: OpenShift Out-of-the-Box Image
--------------------------------+------------------------------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Feature Deadline)
Component: OpenShift Origin | Keywords:
Image |
--------------------------------+------------------------------------------
'''Summary:''' Fedora Cloud agreed to make a base image plus several
tailored to specific purposes. This is one of the tailored ones —
OpenShift ready to run.
'''Importance:''' nice to have (if we fail to do it, we are not any worse-
off than we are now, and OpenShift can still be installed on the base
iamge.)
'''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha / If it's not ready for alpha, we have missed
this release
'''Scope:''' self-contained (in collaboration with OpenShift developers)
'''Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenShift_Out-of-the-
Box_Cloud_Image
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/25>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#28: discuss modularized SELinux policy packaging
------------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: Cloud Base Image | Keywords:
------------------------------+-----------------------
Possible F22 feature?
Summary: Monolith SELinux policy has rules for everything that could
exist, not just that which is installed. Possible room for reduction here.
'''Importance:''' nice-to-have
'''Timeframe:''' F21 or F22 / This is not low-hanging fruit.
'''Scope:''' self-contained (SELinux)
'''
Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD
(No Feature filed at this time -- discuss with SELinux policy maintainers)
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/28>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#73: test cases for cloud-init
--------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Final)
Component: Testing & QA | Keywords:
--------------------------+-------------------------------
We have a number of bugs for #cloud-config syntax not working properly --
probably because it's mostly been tested with debian/ubuntu-universe
tools.
For example:
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126857
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126365
We should fix these, obviously, but also, each time we fix one, we should
make a test case -- ideally an automatic test case! -- to make sure it
stays fixed.
It would also be nice to have some other test cases for cloud-config
syntax we expect to work.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/73>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#57: get official images uploaded into Rackspace
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21
Component: Infrastructure & Release | (Final)
Engineering | Keywords:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Work with Rackspace engineers... they don't yet have public image sharing,
but getting our official images uploaded to a fedora account as part of
the release process would be a good start.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/57>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
#42: policies for batched updates
------------------------------+-------------------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Final)
Component: Software Updates | Keywords:
------------------------------+-------------------------------
See ticket #18
We want to putting out updated images periodically (or aperiodically as
needed). What are the rules? What are the procedures? Where are they
documented?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/42>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System