cloud July 2015

cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

21 participants
75 discussions

[cloud] #23: File F21 change: Re-factor cloud-init
by Nobody 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#23: File F21 change: Re-factor cloud-init ------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Feature Deadline) Component: Cloud Base Image | Keywords: ------------------------------+------------------------------------------ '''Summary:''' Cloud Init was initially designed for a different distribution and is only loosely tailored for our needs. As it stands, it pulls in a rather large set of packages not used for other things. It is also written in Python, itself a large subsystem which it would eventually be nice to leave out of the base. Effort is moderate, with some low- hanging fruit which may be addressed easily. '''Importance:''' vital long term, but just moderate for F21 (We really need this, but if we don't get work it now, it's in acceptable shape for this release.) '''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha, or F22 / if we don't make alpha with changes, this can go in next release. '''Scope:''' Self-contained '''Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/23> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

2 15

[cloud] #112: Ultimately reducing the tools installed in the Fedora docker image, but first getting messaging and expectations right
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#112: Ultimately reducing the tools installed in the Fedora docker image, but first getting messaging and expectations right -------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: bex | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: --- | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------- See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bex/docker_image_reduction A quick examination of just commands loaded in /usr/bin showed significant differences between the F21 and F22 docker images. Consensus seems to be forming around the idea that the Fedora docker image should be composed of a minimum install of Fedora required to get dnf running. After that all tools desired by the consumer should be added by the consumer. This is inline with the "one process per container" philosphy that many people use when thinking about containers. However, we did ship more than a minimal image with F21 and we broke that expectation in F22. Additionally, other distributions are shipping images that contain some "non-minimal" tools, such as 'ps' or 'vi', therefore users may expect them be in the Fedora images. One solution is to include these tools today, but to explicitly note that they are not guaranteed to be included in future versions. Additionally, we should begin to encourage a new best practice of explicitly `dnf install`ing any tools needed. Today these installs will be noops, tomorrow they will actually do the install. The full list of proposed re-additions for F22 and ultimate deletions is on the wiki page -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/112> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 6

[cloud] #101: Proposed for Fedora 23 - Support for Windows 10 Client Hyper-V
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#101: Proposed for Fedora 23 - Support for Windows 10 Client Hyper-V ----------------------------+-------------------- Reporter: znmeb | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Future Component: Docker (Other) | Keywords: ----------------------------+-------------------- I'm currently testing the F22 Project Atomic as a guest on Windows 8.1 Client Hyper-V. I can convert the TC 2 beta qcow2 to vhdx via qemu-img, boot the disk with the credentials ISO in a Generation 1 Hyper-V guest, log in as "fedora", sudo to "root" and do a 'docker run' pulling an image from Docker Hub. I still need to test browsing to a host-only network adapter from the Windows desktop but that's just a matter of reading a few more manuals. And generation 2 VMs don't work and would need to work for this to be supportable. So I would like to propose supporting this use case in Fedora 23. I don't have an effort estimate at the moment. A minimum task list so far would be: 1. Operationalize the conversion from qcow2 to vhdx in the release process. 2. Get generation 2 machines working. This may have to wait until Windows 10 ships. 3. Define test scenarios and build Windows PowerShell scripts to execute them. 4. Documentation! I'll volunteer for 3 and 4 for now - it's on my road map for my remix anyway. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/101> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 1

[cloud] #34: External need: batched updates
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#34: External need: batched updates --------------------+------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Flock 2014 Component: --- | Keywords: --------------------+------------------------ '''Summary:''' We want to produce updated images on a monthly cadence. It would be nice if we could produce those from QA'd bunches of packages. '''Importance:''' moderate (it will be hard to implement image refresh without this, but we could do it) '''Timeframe:''' F21 release + 1 month / Obviously better if we get things lined up earlier '''Fedora Sub-Project/SIG:''' Primarily QA, but Rel Eng and Infrastructure too. This is pretty big. ''' Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD (this probably needs someone actively contributing to initial and ongoing work) See the related Change proposal "(A)Periodic Updates to the Images" http://flock2013.sched.org/event/8c4f702e42814598e0e4e31b188a0ae6 What's this ticket about? We need an owner for this — someone to drive it forward. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/34> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 2

[cloud] #110: Make NFS file sync work with Vagrant seamlessly
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#110: Make NFS file sync work with Vagrant seamlessly ------------------------------+-------------------------- Reporter: rtnpro | Owner: rtnpro Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Software Updates | Keywords: vagrant, nfs ------------------------------+-------------------------- Issues ====== 1. Vagrant 1.7.2 does not identify proper flavor for Fedora, so, during starting NFS client services in a Fedora guest, it fails. This issue seems to have been fixed in Vagrant's master branch. We need to patch the current RPM package for vagrant with the fixes. 2. By default vagrant guest OS tries to communicate to NFS server in the host Fedora box using NFS v3 and it fails. It works correctly if we explicitly ask vagrant to use NFS v4 using nfs_version: 4. This needs to be documented for Fedora properly. 3. The biggest obstacle is mapping UID, GID from host OS to guest OS for NFS 'all_squash' option to work. For example, in my host OS,the UID and GID for my user is 1000, while that of vagrant's in the guest OS is 1001. I am not sure what's the right way to fix it. Use some provisioning scripts to configure the box on the fly? -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/110> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 1

[cloud] #81: Create cloud training materials for ambassadors
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#81: Create cloud training materials for ambassadors -------------------------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Collaboration & Communication | Keywords: -------------------------------------------+----------------------- Many Fedora Ambassadors come from a desktop or old-school sysadmin background. Cloudy concepts are new and foreign. In talking with some of them, it was suggested that it'd be really, really helpful to have some basic training materials for our own ambassadors -- what is cloud, why does it matter, what is Fedora Cloud, what is our strategy, why do _we_ matter, and so on. http://mattdm.org/fedora/cloud2013/#1 might be a starting point. Maybe some more interactive training would even be useful. Of course, it'd also be awesome to get some people from the new modern world interested in being ambassadors as well -- another direction to approach the same issue. (But even then, training on what _we_ are doing would be useful.) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/81> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

2 3

[cloud] #38: Automatic Smoketests on Image Build
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#38: Automatic Smoketests on Image Build --------------------------+------------------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Alpha) Component: Testing & QA | Keywords: --------------------------+------------------------------- '''Summary:''' When a new image is built in Koji, automatically boot it and run a basic matrix of tests. '''Importance:''' moderate (worst case, we can keep doing this by hand) '''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha / Want to reduce manual test workload '''Fedora Sub-Project/SIG:''' QA and the Taskotran project '''Cloud SIG owner:''' Sandro Mathys https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Taskotron -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/38> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 6

[cloud] #25: File F21 change: OpenShift Out-of-the-Box Image
by Nobody 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#25: File F21 change: OpenShift Out-of-the-Box Image --------------------------------+------------------------------------------ Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Feature Deadline) Component: OpenShift Origin | Keywords: Image | --------------------------------+------------------------------------------ '''Summary:''' Fedora Cloud agreed to make a base image plus several tailored to specific purposes. This is one of the tailored ones — OpenShift ready to run. '''Importance:''' nice to have (if we fail to do it, we are not any worse- off than we are now, and OpenShift can still be installed on the base iamge.) '''Timeframe:''' F21 alpha / If it's not ready for alpha, we have missed this release '''Scope:''' self-contained (in collaboration with OpenShift developers) '''Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpenShift_Out-of-the- Box_Cloud_Image -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/25> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

2 2

[cloud] #28: discuss modularized SELinux policy packaging
by Nobody 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#28: discuss modularized SELinux policy packaging ------------------------------+----------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Cloud Base Image | Keywords: ------------------------------+----------------------- Possible F22 feature? Summary: Monolith SELinux policy has rules for everything that could exist, not just that which is installed. Possible room for reduction here. '''Importance:''' nice-to-have '''Timeframe:''' F21 or F22 / This is not low-hanging fruit. '''Scope:''' self-contained (SELinux) ''' Cloud SIG owner:''' TBD (No Feature filed at this time -- discuss with SELinux policy maintainers) -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/28> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

2 1

[cloud] #73: test cases for cloud-init
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets 13 Oct '16

13 Oct '16

#73: test cases for cloud-init --------------------------+------------------------------- Reporter: mattdm | Owner: Type: task | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Fedora 21 (Final) Component: Testing & QA | Keywords: --------------------------+------------------------------- We have a number of bugs for #cloud-config syntax not working properly -- probably because it's mostly been tested with debian/ubuntu-universe tools. For example: * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126857 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1126365 We should fix these, obviously, but also, each time we fix one, we should make a test case -- ideally an automatic test case! -- to make sure it stays fixed. It would also be nice to have some other test cases for cloud-config syntax we expect to work. -- Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/73> cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud> Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System

1 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cloud July 2015