Separate Repository for Atomic Specific Fedora-Dockerfiles
by Trishna Guha
Hi,
We have a repository on Github named Fedora-Dockerfiles [0]. The Repository
contains Dockerfiles but those are not **atomic** specific.
So adding ability to use **atomic** command will make **other hosts** lose
the ability to use the Dockerfiles.
Since we are focusing on having production ready Dockerfiles for Atomic
host, Should we create a separate repository that contains Atomic specific
Dockerfiles?
[0] https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles
--
Regards,
Trishna Guha
7 years
Fedora Release Tools Demo (Canceled) - Written Status
by Amanda Carter
Hi folks, due to travel and various obstacles, we're not able to host a recorded demo this month. Instead we've put together a status report that includes some additional highlights we think you might be interested in. If you have feedback and/or think this works well, I'd love to know b/c I think this vehicle covers more information than a demo alone so I might do both in the future if it's worth it.
Apologies for missing the actual show and tell - if there's anything you'd like to see specifically, I'm sure we can arrange something.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/StatusReport#13SEP2016
--
Amanda Carter
7 years, 1 month
Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging
by Adam Miller
Hello all,
I was recently discussing some items around docker layered image
release process in the future with Randy (bowlofeggs) and Patrick
(puiterwijk). As a side effect of our discussion there were two
questions I wanted to ask of the Cloud WG:
1) Do we want to maintain docker images for every Fedora Release or do
we want to focus only on latest? (i.e. - do we want to maintain them
like we do rpms or take a different position)
2) Do we want to keep around multiple versions of a container?
For example:
If we had the following images:
registry.fedoraproject.org/cockpit:0.95-1.23
registry.fedoraproject.org/cockpit:0.95-1.24
registry.fedoraproject.org/cockpit:0.95-1.25
One we release to stable 0.95-1.25, can we delete -1.24 and/or
-1.23? What kind of retention do we want here? (Note that rpm content
does not currently maintain a N and N-1 in the repositories)
Thank you,
-AdamM
7 years, 1 month
[atomic-wg] Issue #160 `Ship fedora-motd in F24 atomic image`
by Pagure
walters added a new comment to an issue you are following:
``
To repeat again, I am a big fan of this effort - having a nicer interactive experience is great! The cockpit guys were working on something similar to what CoreOS does with displaying the host IP addresses in the console too.
But the PAM and update stacks are about some of the most senstitive/critical aspects of the OS, and we have to be really careful when tying them together.
``
To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email
https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/160
7 years, 1 month
