cloud October 2016

cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org

21 participants
110 discussions

Announcing Fedora Atomic "latest" download URLs
by Adam Miller 24 Dec '16

24 Dec '16

Hello all, On behalf of the Fedora Cloud Working Group, I am happy to announce that we now have a persistent point of download for users who would like to simply reference a single URL for scripting purposes or otherwise. There is also a companion set of URLs that provide the image name that can be downloaded for informational purposes or scripting. This will allow users to download the image and know the resulting image name without any human interaction needed. The rationale behind this was to make sure that users always be aware of the version (compose id) of the image they downloaded in order to not have issues/bugs filed against an image named "latest" that is changing out from under users every two weeks. The new URLs are below: https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_libvirt_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_virtualbox_latest https://getfedora.org/atomic_qcow2_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_raw_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_libvirt_latest_filename https://getfedora.org/atomic_vagrant_virtualbox_latest_filename I have also updated the Cloud Wiki[0] page to include information about these as well as a sample script of how to use them together. Thank you, -AdamM [0] - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud#Fedora_Cloud_Atomic_Image_Download_Lin…

5 7

Separate Repository for Atomic Specific Fedora-Dockerfiles
by Trishna Guha 17 Nov '16

17 Nov '16

Hi, We have a repository on Github named Fedora-Dockerfiles [0]. The Repository contains Dockerfiles but those are not **atomic** specific. So adding ability to use **atomic** command will make **other hosts** lose the ability to use the Dockerfiles. Since we are focusing on having production ready Dockerfiles for Atomic host, Should we create a separate repository that contains Atomic specific Dockerfiles? [0] https://github.com/fedora-cloud/Fedora-Dockerfiles -- Regards, Trishna Guha

4 6

Fedora Release Tools Demo (Canceled) - Written Status
by Amanda Carter 08 Nov '16

08 Nov '16

Hi folks, due to travel and various obstacles, we're not able to host a recorded demo this month. Instead we've put together a status report that includes some additional highlights we think you might be interested in. If you have feedback and/or think this works well, I'd love to know b/c I think this vehicle covers more information than a demo alone so I might do both in the future if it's worth it. Apologies for missing the actual show and tell - if there's anything you'd like to see specifically, I'm sure we can arrange something. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/StatusReport#13SEP2016 -- Amanda Carter

1 2

[atomic-wg] Issue #175 `Fedora 24 atomic image Fedora-Atomic-24-20161025.0.x86_64.qcow is not allowing ssh`
by Pagure 04 Nov '16

04 Nov '16

kushal reported a new issue against the project: `atomic-wg` that you are following: `` Even though autocloud managed to ssh, when I tried to ssh into an instance on our OpenStack, it never allowed a connection. Opening this ticket to dig more into this. * https://apps.fedoraproject.org/autocloud/jobs/1016/output * http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-24-20161025… `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/175

1 5

Docker Layered Image Naming and Tagging
by Adam Miller 03 Nov '16

03 Nov '16

Hello all, I was recently discussing some items around docker layered image release process in the future with Randy (bowlofeggs) and Patrick (puiterwijk). As a side effect of our discussion there were two questions I wanted to ask of the Cloud WG: 1) Do we want to maintain docker images for every Fedora Release or do we want to focus only on latest? (i.e. - do we want to maintain them like we do rpms or take a different position) 2) Do we want to keep around multiple versions of a container? For example: If we had the following images: registry.fedoraproject.org/cockpit:0.95-1.23 registry.fedoraproject.org/cockpit:0.95-1.24 registry.fedoraproject.org/cockpit:0.95-1.25 One we release to stable 0.95-1.25, can we delete -1.24 and/or -1.23? What kind of retention do we want here? (Note that rpm content does not currently maintain a N and N-1 in the repositories) Thank you, -AdamM

4 14

FYI: F25 image builds - none for the past few days
by Dusty Mabe 02 Nov '16

02 Nov '16

On thursday night the image builds didn't run because pagure was intermittently down. For the past 2 nights they have failed to build. I'm not sure why exactly but there is some libvirt error [1] in the logs. Dennis has been looking into this for us. I'm hoping we can an image built to look at before the freeze on Tuesday. If we do get one I'll post here and ask everyone to give it a spin if they can. Dusty [1] https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4430/16254430/oz-x86_64.log

2 4

Where is Kushal Das for the rest of the week?
by Kushal Das 01 Nov '16

01 Nov '16

Hi all, Today, and tomorrow are holidays in India. On Wednesday I will be travelling to Cambodia for FUDCon APAC. I will be back home on Monday evening. I am hoping to have a working internet connection during the conference. Kushal -- Fedora Cloud Engineer CPython Core Developer https://kushaldas.in https://dgplug.org

1 0

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Cloud Workgroup
by Dusty Mabe 01 Nov '16

01 Nov '16

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Cloud Workgroup on 2016-11-02 from 17:00:00 to 18:00:00 UTC At fedora-meeting-1(a)irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Standing meeting for the Fedora Cloud Workgroup Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/1999/

1 0

Need karma on new docker package in F25
by Dusty Mabe 27 Oct '16

27 Oct '16

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0ed0314ad7 We need karma on this package so we can get new docker-storage-setup to take care of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387934. Dusty

1 0

[atomic-wg] Issue #160 `Ship fedora-motd in F24 atomic image`
by Pagure 27 Oct '16

27 Oct '16

walters added a new comment to an issue you are following: `` To repeat again, I am a big fan of this effort - having a nicer interactive experience is great! The cockpit guys were working on something similar to what CoreOS does with displaying the host IP addresses in the console too. But the PAM and update stacks are about some of the most senstitive/critical aspects of the OS, and we have to be really careful when tying them together. `` To reply, visit the link below or just reply to this email https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/160

1 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cloud October 2016