[cloud] #170: Finish new Fedora Cloud PRD
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#170: Finish new Fedora Cloud PRD
---------------------+---------------------
Reporter: jberkus | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: --- | Keywords: meeting
---------------------+---------------------
At Flock, we started but did not finish a revised Cloud PRD.
This needs to be finished. Not sure who to assign this to.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/170>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
6 years, 6 months
Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-08-31
by Trishna Guha
summary: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-08-31/fedora_clou...
full log: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-08-31/fedora_clou...
==================================
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_cloud_wg
==================================
Meeting started by trishnag at 16:59:36 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-08-31/fedora_clou...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (trishnag, 16:59:41)
* rtnpro will add test workflow (and test cases) for testing fedora-motd
on F24 atomic image (trishnag, 17:01:31)
* Action items from last meeting (trishnag, 17:02:45)
* rtnpro will add test workflow (and test cases) for testing fedora-motd
on F24 atomic image (trishnag, 17:03:01)
* ACTION: rtnpro will add test workflow (and test cases) for testing
fedora-motd on F24 atomic image (trishnag, 17:05:38)
* gholms to test updated cloud-init on f24 for f25 (trishnag, 17:06:25)
* cloud-init 0.7.7 now in rawhide, needs testing on more clouds than I
have access to (gholms, 17:06:53)
* It's also in f25 updates-testing (gholms, 17:07:18)
* ACTION: kushal to test new cloud-init on openstack (gholms,
17:07:58)
* vvaldez to talk with misc, scollier, jberkus about how he can help
with FOSP (#153) (trishnag, 17:10:57)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/153 (trishnag,
17:12:49)
* #125 Fedora-Dockerfiles examples for Kubernetes (trishnag, 17:14:53)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/125 (trishnag,
17:15:03)
* #136 vagrant boxes fixups (trishnag, 17:17:06)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/136 (trishnag,
17:17:10)
* #147 Don't overwrite download location for 2 week atomic images
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/147 (trishnag, 17:19:28)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.o...
(kushal, 17:22:27)
* #154 make Fedora Atomic download page clearer
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/154 (trishnag, 17:23:57)
* #155 Decide on post-GA update cadence for various deliverables
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/155 (trishnag, 17:25:20)
* #156 Need complete Kickstart docs for Atomic Host
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/156 (trishnag, 17:28:30)
* #160 Ship fedora-motd in F24 atomic image
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/160 (trishnag, 17:30:39)
* #167 Decide a process about failed tests for Autocloud
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/167 (trishnag, 17:31:36)
* #168 Put OpenShift Origin in Container with Fedora Base
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/168 (trishnag, 17:36:44)
* ACTION: jberkus will draft spec for IRC bot for blocker bugs
(kushal, 17:46:22)
* Open Floor (trishnag, 17:47:53)
Meeting ended at 17:58:07 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* rtnpro will add test workflow (and test cases) for testing fedora-motd
on F24 atomic image
* kushal to test new cloud-init on openstack
* jberkus will draft spec for IRC bot for blocker bugs
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* jberkus
* jberkus will draft spec for IRC bot for blocker bugs
* kushal
* kushal to test new cloud-init on openstack
* rtnpro
* rtnpro will add test workflow (and test cases) for testing
fedora-motd on F24 atomic image
* **UNASSIGNED**
* (none)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* trishnag (78)
* kushal (43)
* jberkus (29)
* zodbot (21)
* maxamillion (20)
* scollier (11)
* sayan (11)
* walters (11)
* gholms (10)
* rtnpro (8)
* misc (7)
* jbrooks (6)
* vvaldez (4)
* bowlofeggs (1)
* nzwulfin (1)
* nirik (1)
* dustymabe (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
6 years, 6 months
[cloud] #125: Fedora-Dockerfiles examples for Kubernetes
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#125: Fedora-Dockerfiles examples for Kubernetes
----------------------+--------------------
Reporter: scollier | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: --- | Keywords:
----------------------+--------------------
Would be nice to have a couple of services put together to create an
application that is managed by Kubernetes on Atomic. This would need to
be clearly documented. We would need the proper json kubernetes files to
launch the apps with. A few examples would be nice:
1. simple web server with a database
2. simple web server
3. others?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/125>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
6 years, 6 months
Don't overwrite Two Week Atomic (Ticket #147)
by Adam Miller
Hello all,
I just wanted to throw out a note to everyone that I've gotten a chance
to work on this[0] and pending some testing we should be good to go for next
Two Week Atomic Release ... however, this is going to cause issues where the
download link is broken for an unknown period of time while two things
happen:
1) the website renders post fedmsg about the release being done
2) the mirrors checking in to sync the new data.
This likely won't be a massive problem as we've seen some inconsistency with
the download link due to mirrors sync'ing in the past (because we don't have
a way to intelligently "teach" MirrorManager about the images like we can
for yum/dnf repo metadata so the metalink isn't pruned dynamically), but I
wanted to be sure and mention it.
Once the change is made, the new download location will be:
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/$COMPOSE_ID/
We will maintain a N and N-1 of $COMPOSE_ID directories in the stable/ base
dir.
We will also now have a 'latest' directory that will always point to the
latest stable content:
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/latest/
This change is not finalized at this time so if there are any requested
alterations, please make them between now and the next Two Week Release.
Thanks,
-AdamM
[0] - https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/147
[1] - https://pagure.io/releng/pull-request/101
6 years, 6 months
Re: Proposal: for F26, move Cloud Base Image to Server WG
by Chris Murphy
On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 25 August 2016 at 13:34, Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>> We've talked about this for a while, but let's make it formal. The plan
>> is to transition from Cloud as a Fedora Edition to Something Container
>> Clustery (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/ProjectFAO).
>>
>> But, we still need cloud as a _deploy target_. The FAO-container-thing
>> will continue to have cloud image deploy targets (as well as bare
>> metal). I think it makes sense to _also_ have Fedora Server as a cloud
>> deploy target.
>>
>
> Could we make sure that whatever targets we have are actually getting
> tested? The fact that autocloud has said it was broken for months but
> the cloud sig wasn't looking or fixing says that before we get to step
> 2, we need to say 'is anyone more than 2 people really interested?' It
> should be ok to say 'no we aren't.' without people diving into the
> fire trying to rescue something that unless it was on fire they
> wouldn't have helped.
There are a lot of images being produced and I have no idea if they're
really needed. That a release blocking image (cloud base qcow2) nearly
caused F25 alpha to slip because it was busted at least suggests it
probably shouldn't be release blocking anymore. FWIW, cloud base qcow2
now gets grub2 in lieu of extlinux as the work around for the
breakage.
--
Chris Murphy
6 years, 6 months
Atomic ISO images still using wrong tree
by Dusty Mabe
The atomic ISO images are using the wrong tree. The images built on
8/23 [1] yield the following system after an install:
-bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status
TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAME REFSPEC
* 2016-06-15 09:57:04 24.39 2c7d41e8a6 fedora-atomic fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
The tree it has on the ISO is from 06/15. Whereas the latest tree is
actually something like this:
-bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status
State: idle
Deployments:
fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
Version: 24.25 (2016-08-23 12:30:17)
Commit: 29330133bb883ae3e257ceb40676bb21a59aecd98eb3068f0d3f8675a12ab4f3
OSName: fedora-atomic
GPGSignature: (unsigned)
● fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
Version: 24.13 (2016-08-09 04:25:51)
Commit: 900457420c4881a937e9167fc6cde670cbada858e3290943417279a76708be75
OSName: fedora-atomic
GPGSignature: (unsigned)
[1] - https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose//twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-24-2016...
6 years, 6 months
