Re: Cloud Atomic Server WGs
by Matthew Miller
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 04:45:10PM -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> Just want to note that the user-facing edition offerings do not have
> to reflect the SIG structure should a change happen.
Good point. I hope we'd continue with Workstation, Server, and the
planned Fedora Atomic/OpenShift cluster edition.
--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
6 years, 6 months
Cloud Atomic Server WGs
by Chris Murphy
Couldn't make the Cloud meeting but just skimmed the log;
cross-posting to server@ list.
How about combine Cloud and Server WGs into a new WG with three new sub groups:
hardware, cloud, atomic?
That way you get the benefit of one WG working on the big picture
stuff that enables integration among the outputs. And you get
collaboration that isn't possible by just cross posting emails on two
lists. Curation of the outputs is enhanced so they're optimal when the
products are used together, while not being exclusive to each other.
The differences are minor tweaks in terms of payload, but e.g.
cloud-init is not something most people in the Server WG probably know
much about. So most of Cloud + Server overlaps with really vertical
knowledge base needed to do the small tweaks that cause substantial
product differentiation.
On the issue of membership, anyone unavailable in the next 30 days
should be dropped. There will be another time for their participation
when they're available. I'd look into making it easy to rotate out WG
members to avoid long periods of inactivity which inhibits others'
ability to get stuff done, and avoid burn out when they've been on the
WG too long.
Maybe some WG seats should be ~18 months, and twice as many of those
would be 1 release cycle. i.e. 1/3 of the seats are longer term, and
2/3 are short term. There's sufficient stability in FESCo to make
frequent WG turnover a plus.
--
Chris Murphy
6 years, 6 months
Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-09-21
by Sayan Chowdhury
==================================
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_cloud_wg
==================================
Meeting started by sayan at 17:00:36 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-09-21/fedora_clou...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (sayan, 17:00:48)
* Action items from last meeting (sayan, 17:04:12)
* ACTION: Kushal will work on moving to Pagure from Trac (sayan,
17:06:19)
* vagrant boxes fixups https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/136
(sayan, 17:06:51)
* design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/153 (sayan, 17:08:24)
* make Fedora Atomic download page clearer
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/154 (sayan, 17:11:28)
* Decide on post-GA update cadence for various deliverables
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/155 (sayan, 17:55:09)
* Need complete Kickstart docs for Atomic Host
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/156 (sayan, 17:56:20)
* Put OpenShift Origin in Container with Fedora Base
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/168 (sayan, 17:58:18)
* Open Floor (sayan, 18:00:00)
* ACTION: jbrooks to send out an email to the list regarding Test Day
(sayan, 18:01:56)
Meeting ended at 18:03:17 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* Kushal will work on moving to Pagure from Trac
* jbrooks to send out an email to the list regarding Test Day
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* jbrooks
* jbrooks to send out an email to the list regarding Test Day
* **UNASSIGNED**
* Kushal will work on moving to Pagure from Trac
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* sayan (68)
* dustymabe (63)
* jbrooks (51)
* maxamillion (30)
* zodbot (24)
* jberkus (23)
* smooge (11)
* kushal (10)
* scollier (9)
* bowlofeggs (5)
* trishnag (3)
* tflink (2)
* subho (1)
* nzwulfin (1)
* rtnpro (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
--
Sayan Chowdhury <https://sayanchowdhury.dgplug.org/>
Senior Software Engineer, Fedora Engineering - Emerging Platform
GPG Fingerprint : 0F16 E841 E517 225C 7D13 AB3C B023 9931 9CD0 5C8B
Proud to work at The Open Organization!
6 years, 6 months
overlayfs for AFTER Fedora 25
by Dusty Mabe
In the cloud meeting today I brought up overlayfs and F25. After
discussing with the engineers closer to the technology they recommend
waiting to move to overlayfs as the default in F26.
I think this will work well because it will give us some time to allow
people to "try" overlayfs in F25 (we should provide good docs on this)
and then give us feedback before we go with it as default in F26. If
the feedback is bad then maybe we wouldn't even go with it in F26, but
hopefully that won't be the case.
Thoughts?
Dusty
6 years, 6 months