[cloud] #169: Spec for IRC bot to notify about blockers
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#169: Spec for IRC bot to notify about blockers
---------------------+---------------------
Reporter: jberkus | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: --- | Keywords: meeting
---------------------+---------------------
One of the issues we have with release blockers is slow response by the
fedora-cloud WG. As that group is very IRC-centric, we'd like to have
some form of notification via IRC when a release blocker is encountered.
Here's a draft spec, please revise:
1. whenever a release blocker issue is filed or updated, a message will be
sent via bot to the #fedora-cloud channel;
2. the /topic of #fedora-cloud will be updated with a list of release-
blocker issues once a day.
Questions: how do we identify release-blocker issues?
This relates to issue https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/167
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/169>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
6 years, 6 months
Cloud Meeting Minutes 2016-09-14
by Sayan Chowdhury
==================================
#fedora-meeting-1: fedora_cloud_wg
==================================
Meeting started by sayan at 17:00:24 UTC. The full logs are available at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2016-09-14/fedora_clou...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (sayan, 17:00:33)
* Action items from last meeting (sayan, 17:02:51)
* vagrant boxes fixups https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/136
(sayan, 17:06:00)
* Don't overwrite download location for 2 week atomic images
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/147 (sayan, 17:16:33)
* design, deploy and document Fedora OpenShift Playground (FOSP)
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/153 (sayan, 17:19:47)
* make Fedora Atomic download page clearer
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/154 (sayan, 17:22:46)
* ACTION: Kushal will work on moving to Pagure from Trac (kushal,
17:35:33)
* Decide on post-GA update cadence for various deliverables
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/155 (sayan, 17:36:25)
* Need complete Kickstart docs for Atomic Host
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/156 (sayan, 17:39:29)
* Ship fedora-motd in F24 atomic image
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/160 (sayan, 17:41:40)
* Decide a process about failed tests for Autocloud
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/167 (sayan, 17:43:40)
* LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265295 and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353688 (kushal,
17:44:40)
* Put OpenShift Origin in Container with Fedora Base
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/168 (sayan, 17:55:25)
* Spec for IRC bot to notify about blockers
https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/169 (sayan, 17:56:38)
* Open Floor (sayan, 17:58:11)
* ACTION: kushal will create the vote ticket, and update the list :)
(kushal, 18:05:35)
Meeting ended at 18:05:57 UTC.
Action Items
------------
* Kushal will work on moving to Pagure from Trac
* kushal will create the vote ticket, and update the list :)
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* kushal
* kushal will create the vote ticket, and update the list :)
* **UNASSIGNED**
* Kushal will work on moving to Pagure from Trac
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* kushal (76)
* sayan (67)
* jberkus (61)
* jbrooks (39)
* dustymabe (33)
* maxamillion (32)
* zodbot (20)
* walters (11)
* imcleod (8)
* trishnag (7)
* rtnpro (2)
* tflink (1)
* jdetiber (1)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
--
Sayan Chowdhury <https://sayanchowdhury.dgplug.org/>
Senior Software Engineer, Fedora Engineering - Emerging Platform
GPG Fingerprint : 0F16 E841 E517 225C 7D13 AB3C B023 9931 9CD0 5C8B
Proud to work at The Open Organization!
6 years, 6 months
getfedora/atomic update
by Josh Berkus
Folks,
For the F25 release, we want to update getfedora/cloud to
getfedora/atomic. But this means having a bunch of new content, and
simplifying the list of available downloads.
Here's my stab at it:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Cloud/getfedora_update
Let's discuss this tommorrow during the meeting.
--
--
Josh Berkus
Project Atomic
Red Hat OSAS
6 years, 6 months
[cloud] #154: make Fedora Atomic download page clearer
by Fedora Cloud Trac Tickets
#154: make Fedora Atomic download page clearer
-------------------------------+---------------------
Reporter: jberkus | Owner:
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: Future
Component: Docker Host Image | Keywords: Meeting
-------------------------------+---------------------
The Fedora Atomic Host Download page is confusing to users. I'd like to
make some changes making it clearer what to download and why, including:
* The ISO images should be a main option, not a link in the sidebar
* The qcow2 images, not the raw images, should say "if you're not sure
what to use, use this".
* Each download option should have a link to the specific docs for
installing that kind of download (will wait on new Atomic Host docs,
though)
Also, it would be great if we could list on the download page somewhere
what date the images are from for each 2-week build.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud/ticket/154>
cloud <https://fedorahosted.org/cloud>
Fedora Cloud Working Group Ticketing System
6 years, 6 months
growpart not working in Fedora 25 cloud base
by Dusty Mabe
From https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/5352/15555352/Fedora-Cloud...
Sep 10 03:13:17 cloudhost.localdomain cloud-init[645]: 2016-09-10 03:13:17,078 - util.py[WARNING]: Failed: growpart /dev/sda 1
Sep 10 03:13:17 cloudhost.localdomain cloud-init[645]: [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: Failed: growpart /dev/sda 1
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/cloudinit/config/cc_growpart.py", line 109, in resize
util.subp(["growpart", diskdev, partnum])
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/cloudinit/util.py", line 1724, in subp
cmd=args)
cloudinit.util.ProcessExecutionError: Unexpected error while running command.
Command: ['growpart', '/dev/sda', '1']
Exit code: 2
Reason: -
Stdout: 'FAILED: failed to resize\n'
Stderr: "attempt to resize /dev/sda failed. sfdisk output below:\n| Backup files:\n| MBR (offset 0, size 512): /tmp/growpart.PO8wWI/backup-sda-0x00000000.bak\n| \n| Disk /dev/sda: 10 GiB, 10737418240 bytes, 20971520 sectors\n| Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes\n| Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes\n| I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes\n| Disklabel type: dos\n| Disk identifier: 0x1ef30347\n| \n| Old situation:\n| \n| Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type\n| /dev/sda1 * 2048 6291455 6289408 3G 83 Linux\n| \n| >>> Script header accepted.\n| >>> Script header accepted.\n| >>> Script header accepted.\n| >>> Script header accepted.\n| >>> Created a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x1ef30347.\n| Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 10 GiB.\n| /dev/sda2: \n| New situation:\n| \n| Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type\n| /dev/sda1 * 2048 20971519 20969472 10G 83 Linux\n| \n| The partition table has been altered.\n| Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table.\n| Re-reading the partition table failed.: Device or resource busy\n| The kernel still uses the old table. The new table will be used at the next reboot or after you run partprobe(8) or kpartx(8).\n***** WARNING: Resize failed, attempting to revert ******\n512+0 records in\n512+0 records out\n512 bytes copied, 0.000400551 s, 1.3 MB/s\n***** Appears to have gone OK ****\n"
Sep 10 03:13:17 cloudhost.localdomain cloud-init[645]: [CLOUDINIT] util.py[DEBUG]: resize_devices took 0.127 seconds
Sep 10 03:13:17 cloudhost.localdomain cloud-init[645]: [CLOUDINIT] cc_growpart.py[DEBUG]: '/' FAILED: failed to resize: disk=/dev/sda, ptnum=1: Unexpected error while running command.
Command: ['growpart', '/dev/sda', '1']
Exit code: 2
Reason: -
Stdout: 'FAILED: failed to resize\n'
Stderr: "attempt to resize /dev/sda failed. sfdisk output below:\n| Backup files:\n| MBR (offset 0, size 512): /tmp/growpart.PO8wWI/backup-sda-0x00000000.bak\n| \n| Disk /dev/sda: 10 GiB, 10737418240 bytes, 20971520 sectors\n| Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes\n| Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes\n| I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes\n| Disklabel type: dos\n| Disk identifier: 0x1ef30347\n| \n| Old situation:\n| \n| Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type\n| /dev/sda1 * 2048 6291455 6289408 3G 83 Linux\n| \n| >>> Script header accepted.\n| >>> Script header accepted.\n| >>> Script header accepted.\n| >>> Script header accepted.\n| >>> Created a new DOS disklabel with disk identifier 0x1ef30347.\n| Created a new partition 1 of type 'Linux' and of size 10 GiB.\n| /dev/sda2: \n| New situation:\n| \n| Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type\n| /dev/sda1 * 2048 20971519 20969472 10G 83 Linux\n| \n| The partition table has been altered.\n| Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table.\n| Re-reading the partition table failed.: Device or resource busy\n| The kernel still uses the old table. The new table will be used at the next reboot or after you run partprobe(8) or kpartx(8).\n***** WARNING: Resize failed, attempting to revert ******\n512+0 records in\n512+0 records out\n512 bytes copied, 0.000400551 s, 1.3 MB/s\n***** Appears to have gone OK ****\n"
Should I open a bug for this? Can we get someone to look at it/work on it?
Dusty
6 years, 6 months
More Atomic troubles on F25
by Adam Williamson
So since I was told to make more noise...:) F25 composes no longer seem
to be hitting the chrony bug (RHBZ #1331864) for some reason - Rawhide
composes still do - so install from the Atomic DVD installer image
succeeds. However, booting the installed system fails. I *think* this
is because its initramfs is broken. See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374082 for more details.
Thanks!
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
6 years, 6 months
