On 11/17/2011 09:50 PM, Steve Traylen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Toshio Kuratomi
<a.badger(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> ust a note: python-webob1.1 would be better (packaging guidelines were
> recently updated to allow dots in package names for this purpose.). You can
> ask the upstream if they have any backwards compatibility to version number
> policies as well. Sometimes when a project goes to 1.0 and beyond, they
> change their versioning policies so that major number releases are all
> compatible. Other times they stick with the minor number since they've
> gotten used to it throughout their 0.x development.
Hi,
I've just posted python-webobj10 which is 1.0.8.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754848
I'm reviewing the above.
I've posted python-sqlalchemy0.7-0.7.3-2 here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755065
Review swap?
I've built local glance and nova packages against
the above 2 compat packages and initial tests are passing.
I'm commit the openstack updates soon.
cheers,
Pádraig.