Re: 32 bit slicehost hosts?
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:21 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Adam Miller
<maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Does the RPM section of this post make sense to you guys?
>>
>> http://www.slicehost.com/articles/2010/3/1/32-bit-images-now-available#co...
>>
>> Seth has already made a comment, thought I'd get more eyes on it.
>>
>> -Mike
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cloud mailing list
>> cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>>
>
> Yeah, I don't know where they got that from and I don't entirely
> understand their issue. Since Fedora 9 (that's as far back as I
> remember it being flawless) I've had great success with things like
> what I assume they are trying to do.
>
> -AdamM
>
Ok if I am understanding this correctly.. the slicehost may not be a
virtual machine but a virtual protected system. In this case, they are
not running a seperate VT but one of the other ways of doing things.
So a pure 32 bit environment is not what they want but a mixed 64/32
bit environment.. with more stuff being 32 bit enabled.
Again this is me sort of understanding what they are talking about...
Ok turns out i did not understand at all :). Onto learning more.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning