On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 02:19:19AM -0000, hannes@ucsc.edu wrote:
> What is the motivation for the eager deletion of the official Fedora
> VM images (AMIs) from EC2? The image for 21 is already gone even
> though it is not even two years old. Ubuntu is keeping the images
> around much longer.

Which AMI ID are you looking for, in which regions? We had a problem

Fedora 21 for HVM in us-west-2. I can dig up the AMI ID if you'd like. Id' have to look at our past CI builds. This is how we're searching for them:

https://github.com/BD2KGenomics/cgcloud/blob/a1d3d752fd05d35f8b9ce0487af4b7e156ce55d8/core/src/cgcloud/core/fedora_box.py#L30

 
where we accidentally had many _unreleased_ snapshots consuming space
and costing us significant money, and recently cleaned those up.
However, all of the _released_ images back to F18 should still be
there. In US East for F21, we have ami-d2d999ba for F21 PV and
ami-acd999c4 and ami-78bafa10 for HVM. (I'm not sure offhand what the
distinction between those other two is -- I'm looking this up in the
middle of a meeting...)

Of course, we *do* strongly recommend using the supported releases, but
we understand that it's important to have time to transition and that
sometimes old images are useful for testing, too.


--
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@fedoraproject.org>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org



--
Hannes Schmidt
Software Engineer
Center for Biomolecular Science and Engineering
University of California, Santa Cruz

(206) 696-2316 (cell)
hannes@ucsc.edu