On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Haïkel <hguemar@fedoraproject.org> wrote:


Le 18 sept. 2014 19:11, "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb@redhat.com> a écrit :
>
> On 09/18/2014 12:09 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > But I think we should name and ratify a new slate to better reflect the
> > active state of the SIG in the past few months. Anyone opposed?
>
> No opposition here. +1
>

+1
Actually, we hardly reach the quorum so it's not even working.

I think the biggest problem is getting a time that syncs for everyone. This is just my opinion. I however would like to hear what folks will have to say and how to move forward.  

If possible I'd like us to be more inclusive with the SIG, to make it easier to include new people.

> --
> Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
> jzb@redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
> Twitter: @jzb  | http://dissociatedpress.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>


_______________________________________________
cloud mailing list
cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




--
Skype: Frankie.Onuonga
twitter: Frankieonuonga
irc #freenode: Frankieonuonga