On 04/27/2012 06:21 PM, Matt_Domsch@Dell.com wrote:
Re: Openstack in HTTPD URL Scheme NameVirtualHost localhost?

We can use Virtual hosts to distinguish but that implies either  separate ports or DNS support.  I'd like to stay away from multiple ports due to the SELinux port assignments clashing with the ones the OPenstack tends to use,  but named virtual hosts will work fine.

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Young [ayoung@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2012 04:36 PM Central Standard Time
To: cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Openstack in HTTPD URL Scheme

On 04/27/2012 05:33 PM, Christian Berendt wrote:
> Hello Adam.
> On 04/27/2012 11:25 PM, Adam Young wrote:
>> #should this be keystone or identity?
> I would prefer using always the development name of the project, in
> this case keystone.
> Regards, Christian.
Thanks, Christian.  I suspect that will work better with documentation
as well.

Pete Zaitcev also has pointed out that Swift probably won't play nicely
with this,  as the URL scheme is pretty much driven by Amazon, and it
assumes a top level URL along the lines of


cloud mailing list