Adding rel-eng. They might be able to help us out more on this topic.
Could you maybe add a little bit more information? Like what tree is
expected to be there etc? Presumably this is the two week release?
Peter
> On 08/23/2016 10:09 PM, Dusty Mabe wrote:
>> The atomic ISO images are using the wrong tree. The images built on
>> 8/23 [1] yield the following system after an install:
>>
>> -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status
>> TIMESTAMP (UTC) VERSION ID OSNAME REFSPEC
>> * 2016-06-15 09:57:04 24.39 2c7d41e8a6 fedora-atomic
fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
>>
>> The tree it has on the ISO is from 06/15. Whereas the latest tree is
>> actually something like this:
>>
>> -bash-4.3# rpm-ostree status
>> State: idle
>> Deployments:
>> fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
>> Version: 24.25 (2016-08-23 12:30:17)
>> Commit: 29330133bb883ae3e257ceb40676bb21a59aecd98eb3068f0d3f8675a12ab4f3
>> OSName: fedora-atomic
>> GPGSignature: (unsigned)
>>
>> ● fedora-atomic:fedora-atomic/24/x86_64/docker-host
>> Version: 24.13 (2016-08-09 04:25:51)
>> Commit: 900457420c4881a937e9167fc6cde670cbada858e3290943417279a76708be75
>> OSName: fedora-atomic
>> GPGSignature: (unsigned)
>>
>>
>> [1] -
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose//twoweek/Fedora-Atomic-24-2016...
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cloud mailing list
> cloud(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org