On Fri, 7 Mar 2014 19:46:28 +0900
"Sandro \"red\" Mathys" <red(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
<snip>
>> When I took ownership of this "external
>> need" (for the Fedora cloud product) I was under the impression we
>> only just (are going to) have Taskotron and everyone knows it's THE
>> way to go.
>
> I personally love collaboration. It would be awesome if we could
> avoid spreading resources on '3 systems for 1 task'. I definitely
> want to know more about Taskotron and its movement towards cloud
> image testing.
That's why I was a bit confused to find there's actually 3 systems.
Collaboration is certainly great, but that's not how it's done so
let's try to improve on this.
So, would you recommend to keep using your tools or rather go with
Taskotron? Or do we do some things in one and others in the other? Or
do we try to fully implement your tests in Taskotron and drop doing
the tests with your tools?
I still don't understand why this is an either/or. As I mentioned
earlier, Taskotron and valid do not seem to be trying to accomplish the
same goals. From what I can see, they should be able to be integrated
without too much trouble and I strongly suspect that level of effort
would be far less than setting up separate systems.
Tim