On 09/29/2014 09:16 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> Okay, so, I went through the IRC logs, e-mail archives,
, and tickets. I identified this last of the
> the most active cloud SIG members, and I think that the voting WG membership
> should reflect this. This ends up dropping quite a few of the active
> members, which I think is okay -- it's not a black mark or anything. We've
> been operating very well with a blurred line and now formal distinction, and
> this is just meant to bring the list into sync with activity.
Should we have a "speak up by X date or hold your peace" on this?
(I generally favor lazy consensus, 72 hours.)
Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst
jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/
Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/
I didn't know I had to speak up :) I'm more than happy to be included in the