On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Joe Brockmeier <jzb(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On 12/10/2013 04:45 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> Two short thoughts about this:
> - do we really need to distinguish between public, private and hybrid
> cloud? IMHO that shouldn't really matter for the image.
It matters for the image format (AMI vs. qcow2, etc.) and may matter for
packages that are included in the image as well.
Why would it matter for the format? AMI or qcow2 both work in public,
private and hybrid clouds. Or am I missing something?
Any examples what should be different in terms of packages? I can't
think of anything that is public/private/hybrid specific.
-- Sandro