On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Daniel P. Berrange
<berrange(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 05:37:32PM -0400, Adam Young wrote:
> Pete Zaitcev also has pointed out that Swift probably won't play
> nicely with this, as the URL scheme is pretty much driven by
> Amazon, and it assumes a top level URL along the lines of
>
>
>
http://test-1235163301.kvm-rei.zaitcev.lan/testdata
>
https://s3.amazonaws.com/test-1235163301/testdata
>
http://kvm-rei.zaitcev.lan/test-1235163301/testdata
If Swift is the only exception, then we would probably be ok, since I
think our other top level name prefixes would be unique enough to not
clash with what Swift used at the top level
Even more, Swift should be a separate hostname, so clashing would
only be a possibility in all-in-one which is a toy/development setup.
Alan